PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Contemporary Clinical Dentistry0 citationsOpen Access

Preendodontic Dentin Hybridization – Effect on Coronal Dentin Microhardness and Resin-Dentin Bond Strength: An In vitro Study

View Full Paper
GPGonapa PrasanthiDMDuvvuri Lakshmi MaliniBDB. Devipriya

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effects of chemical exposure and preendodontic dentin hybridization on coronal dentin properties.
  • Eighty square-shaped coronal dentin specimens were divided into four groups based on chemical exposure time.
  • Groups included Control, Late Dentin Hybridization (LDH), PEDH, and Ultrasonic LDH (ULDH).
  • Specimens underwent bonding tests with composites and microhardness testing using Vickers micro indenter.
  • Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test.
  • LDH resulted in significantly lower bond strength compared to all groups.
  • PEDH maintained bond strength and microhardness similar to the control group.
  • ULDH showed increased bond strength compared to LDH but reduced microhardness across all groups.

Abstract

Background: During endodontic treatment, exposure of coronal dentin to various endodontic chemical substances (ECS) impacts its structural integrity, thereby affecting therapy’s success. This study employs preendodontic dentin hybridization (PEDH) to shield the coronal dentin from ECS. Aim: This study evaluates the influence of chemicals used during endodontic therapy on coronal dentin microhardness and resin–dentin microshear bond strength (µSBS) and the protective effect of PEDH. Methodology: Eighty square-shaped coronal dentin specimens were divided into four groups according to the time of chemical exposure: Control: No exposure to ECS. Late Dentin Hybridization (LDH): Exposed to ECS followed by dentin hybridization (DH); PEDH: DH followed by ECS; Ultrasonic LDH (ULDH): ECS followed by Ultrasonic repreparation then DH. Ten samples in each group were restored with composite and subjected to shear stresses under a Universal testing machine. The remaining 10 samples were tested for microhardness using a Vickers micro indenter. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test. Results: LDH causes a significant reduction in bond strength compared to all groups. The PEDH group exhibits µSBS and microhardness values close to the control group. ULDH group showed increased bond strength values compared to the LDH group, but exhibited a significant reduction in microhardness values compared to all experimental groups. Conclusion: Chemical exposure deteriorates properties of coronal dentin, thereby reducing µSBS and microhardness, whereas PEDH acts as a shield on coronal dentin, which effectively preserves its properties, producing outcomes close to untreated controls without the need for ultrasonic repreparation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Prasanthi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c324de0f0f753b39dc71https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_566_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper