PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Seeing by moving: revisiting pattern vision through fixational eye movements

LSLynn Schmittwilken

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how fixational eye movements, particularly ocular drift, influence visual perception and edge sensitivity.
  • Developed a proof-of-concept model enhancing standard spatial vision through ocular drift.
  • Introduced new software tools and benchmark datasets to investigate spatial frequency mechanisms.
  • Conducted a behavioral task for participants to trace edges in natural scenes, applying signal detection theory for analysis.
  • Incorporating ocular drift into models improved predictions of edge sensitivity.
  • Traditional spatial models showed limitations when excluding the effects of ocular drift.
  • The new dataset allowed for both conventional analysis and exploration of individual differences in edge perception.

Abstract

Visual perception is often conceptualized as the analysis of static images which are acquired during fixations. These images are then spatially decomposed into their basic components, which form the fundament of visual perception. Understanding these spatial mechanisms has been a central aim of pattern vision, and has led to a successful and widely adopted standard model of spatial vision. The spatial view on pattern vision, however, overlooks a key aspect of visual processing: the eyes are never still. Even during fixations, involuntary eye movements incessantly modulate the visual input. These eye movements challenge the assumption that visual processing can occur independently of motion. In recent years, empirical evidence has accumulated which suggests that fixational eye movements, particularly ocular drift, actively shape visual processing. Building on these findings, this thesis argues that ocular drift is essential to how the visual system encodes spatial structure, even in the absence of external motion. It calls for a shift from static to active, spatiotemporal models of pattern vision. To support this shift, it integrates computational modeling, psychophysics, and new experimental tools to explore how ocular drift influences edge and pattern perception. The first part of this thesis revisits foundational assumptions in spatial vision. In a first study, it presents a proof-of-concept model that extends a standard spatial vision model by ocular drift and temporal processing. The active model components facilitate edge extraction, but also reveal limitations in current datasets which cannot clearly distinguish between static and active accounts of pattern vision. In response, the next two studies introduce new software tools and a benchmark dataset that specifically target the spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying pattern vision. Using this dataset, the fourth study explicitly contrasts spatial and active accounts of pattern vision. The results show that incorporating ocular drift improves predictions of human edge sensitivity and reveals that traditional models may rely on compensatory biases to account for the absence of these eye movements. The final study introduces a behavioral task in which participants trace edges in natural scenes. This approach enables the study of pattern vision in more naturalistic contexts while maintaining the analytical rigor of traditional psychophysics through signal detection theory. The resulting dataset supports both standard analyses and investigations into individual differences and the visual features that guide edge perception in real-world settings. Altogether, this thesis integrates insights from active perception into a mechanistically grounded framework of pattern vision. It redefines early visual processing as an active, embodied process shaped by the observer’s own movements. These findings challenge static models of early visual processes and advocate for a broader paradigm shift that places motion, context, and environmental interaction at the core of perception. Finally, it lays a foundation for future research into active models of vision, offering both theoretical direction and practical tools to study visual perception under more natural conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lynn Schmittwilken (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c324de0f0f753b39dc7dhttps://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-25108
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Two distinct modes of ocular drift observed during figure-ground perception2026
  2. 2Computational Characterization of Decision Making During Trans-saccadic Visual Perception2025
  3. 3Residual Foveal Motion Facilitates Processing of Visually Tracked Objects2025
  4. 4Approaching Visual Perception with Spatiotemporally Patterned Optogenetic Stimulation2026
  5. 5Predictive Foveal Processing in Active Vision2026