PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology0 citationsOpen Access

EMERGE: Early antiMicrobial stEwaRdship for GEneral medicine patients—targeting inpatient intravenous therapy greater than 24 hours

SKSharmila KhumraATAshmitha ThomasSVSara Vogrin

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led digital intervention on optimizing IV antimicrobial prescribing in general medical patients.
  • Conducted a prospective, quasi-experimental before-and-after study across six general medicine units.
  • Pharmacist-led AMS recommendations were delivered electronically via Microsoft Teams®.
  • Included adult inpatients receiving IV antimicrobials for more than 24 hours, excluding specific patient groups.
  • Median IV antimicrobial duration remained comparable between phases (2.75 days vs. 3.00 days).
  • Length of stay significantly decreased during the intensive phase (5.5 days vs. 7.6 days; P = .04).
  • 67% of AMS recommendations were for IV-to-oral switches, with overall acceptance at 78%.
  • A decline in piperacillin-tazobactam use and sustained reductions in other antibiotics were observed.
  • Total antibiotic prescribing also showed a reduction.

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Early review of intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy is central to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), however scalable models for general medical patients are limited. We evaluated a pharmacist-led digital intervention to optimize IV antimicrobial prescribing. Methods: A prospective, quasi-experimental before-and-after study was conducted between May 2022 to February 2023 across six general medicine units at a tertiary hospital. AMS recommendations were delivered electronically via Microsoft Teams®. Adult inpatients receiving IV antimicrobials for >24 hours were included, excluding those with COVID-19, under Infectious Diseases consultation or receiving palliative care. The primary outcome was median IV antimicrobial duration. Secondary outcomes included AMS recommendation type, recommendation acceptance, length of stay (LOS), 30-day infection-related readmission, IV therapy recommencement, and inpatient mortality. Antibacterial consumption was analyzed from July 2021 to through December 2024 to evaluate sustained impact. Results: Among 723 antimicrobial orders (474 treatment episodes in 458 patients), median IV duration was comparable between phases (intensive: 2.75 days; baseline: 3.00 days). LOS was shorter during the intensive phase compared to baseline (5.5 vs 7.6 days; P = .04), particularly in patients without bacteremia. Readmissions and mortality were unchanged. Of 400 AMS recommendations, 67% were IV-to-oral switches; overall acceptance was 78%. Piperacillin-tazobactam use declined, and sustained reductions in aminoglycosides, ampicillin and IV flucloxacillin were observed. A reduction in total antibiotic prescribing (combined IV and oral prescribing) was also observed. Conclusions: The digital pharmacist-led AMS intervention did not reduce IV duration, likely reflecting strong baseline prescribing, but was associated with shorter LOS and a reduction in total antibacterial use. This program offered a scalable, sustainable alternative to resource-intensive face-to-face models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khumra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c336de0f0f753b39dd0ehttps://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10313
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper