PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Individual Freedom and Creativity: Hayek, Schumpeter, North, and the Economics of Belonging

View Full Paper
CDCarlos Federico Obregon Diaz

Key Points

  • This work aims to develop a theoretical framework that explains economic development through the lens of belonging and integration.
  • Theoretical analysis of economic concepts
  • Formal modeling, including the belonging function and θ–ε model
  • Comparative empirical analysis of different regional economies
  • Identifies limitations of an individualistic approach in economic theory
  • Explains the contrast between successful and unsuccessful development paths
  • Introduces the concept of the Economics of Belonging as a key factor in creativity and development

Abstract

This book develops a new theoretical framework to understand economic development by integrating the roles of individual freedom, creativity, markets, innovation, institutions, and social structure. It revisits and critically evaluates the contributions of Friedrich Hayek, Joseph Schumpeter, and Douglass North, identifying a shared limitation: an individualistic ontology that treats economic agents as isolated actors. The work is structured around three central empirical questions: (1) the success of Western economies compared to the failure of the Soviet Union; (2) the success of certain Asian economies compared to the stagnation of Latin America; and (3) the structural similarities between successful and unsuccessful development paths. The book introduces the Economics of Belonging, grounded in the ontological proposition that to be is to belong. Within this framework, individual creativity is understood as emerging within systems of social and institutional integration rather than in isolation. Economic outcomes are explained as the result of the interaction between participation capacity, institutional openness, social integration, and middle-class dynamics. The manuscript combines theoretical analysis, formal modeling (including the belonging function and the θ–ε model of creativity), and comparative empirical analysis of Western, Soviet Union, Asian, and Latin American development. It provides a unified explanation of growth, stagnation, and structural divergence across regions. This work is intended for scholars in development economics, institutional economics, political economy, and philosophy of economics, as well as for policymakers interested in long-term development strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c35cde0f0f753b39e14ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19246585
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Markets, Institutions, and Belonging2026
  2. 2From the History of Capitalism to a Post-Neoclassical Synthesis: The Economy of Belonging2026
  3. 3From Veblen to the Economics of Belonging2026
  4. 4THE ECONOMICS OF BELONGING: Philosophy and Economics — The Feedback Loop2026
  5. 5THE ECONOMICS OF BELONGING: Philosophy and Economics — The Feedback Loop2026