PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

The Influence of Different Polishing Systems on the Gloss and Surface Roughness of Two Distinct Nano‐Filled Composites

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LALama A. AlghamdiHFHanan Filemban

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Investigation evaluates surface gloss and roughness of nano-filled composites, indicating optimal polishing strategies for better results.

Key Points

  • This research examines how different polishing systems affect the gloss and surface roughness of nano-filled composites.
  • Compared surface gloss and roughness of two types of nano-filled composites using various polishing systems.
  • Utilized OptraGloss, Diacomp Plus Twist, Enhance, and Super Snap X-Treme for analysis.
  • Assessed the impact of Ceramage modeling agent on surface roughness after polishing.
  • OptraGloss and Diacomp Plus Twist produced superior surface quality compared to others.
  • Enhance and Super Snap X-Treme resulted in less favorable outcomes for surface characteristics.
  • Ceramage effectively reduced surface roughness after initial rough polishing protocols.

Cite This Study

Alghamdi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c35cde0f0f753b39e1e9https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70143
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share