PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Cosmological Energy-Efficiency Cycle: From Free-State Dominance to Constrained Structures and Back

View Full Paper
HYHongpu Yang

Key Points

  • The research aims to unify the understanding of the universe's evolution using Energy-Efficiency Theory.
  • Develops a framework based on Yang's Axioms for the Energy-Efficiency Cycle (YEC).
  • Defines five stages of cosmic evolution influenced by energy states.
  • Derives equations linking critical cosmological parameters and evolution rates.
  • Recovers the Hubble constant at 71.5±1.2 km/s/Mpc and aligns with cosmic microwave background observations.
  • Quantifies key thresholds for different evolutionary stages with significant statistical preference relative to ΛCDM.
  • Predicts transition redshift and scaling relations for cosmic structures.

Abstract

The universe evolves from an initial hot, dense state to the formation of structures—galaxies, stars, planets, life—and now undergoes accelerated expansion driven by dark energy. Despite detailed observations, a unified ontological account of this entire trajectory remains lacking. This paper develops an interpretation within Energy-Efficiency Theory (EET). Starting from Yang's Axioms, we propose that the universe follows a single, global Yang's Energy-Efficiency Cycle (YEC)—a five-stage dynamical paradigm (disturbance →→ response →→ stabilization →→ constraint →→ transition) governing the transformation of energy between free and constrained states, rather than a repetitive oscillation of spacetime. We derive the evolution equation for the constrained-state energy fraction fc=ρc/ρtotalfc=ρc/ρtotal directly from the three axioms, linking the structure formation rate ββ to the escape tendency λˉλˉ and the dissipation rate αα to the gravitational constraint barrier. The YEC stages are defined with quantifiable critical thresholds: disturbance (z>1030)(z>1030), response (1030>z>1100)(1030>z>1100), stabilization (1100>z>0.5)(1100>z>0.5), constraint (0.5>z>0)(0.5>z>0), transition (z<0)(z<0). The framework quantitatively recovers the Hubble constant H0=71.5±1.2H0=71.5±1.2 km/s/Mpc, the CMB power spectrum (ns=0.965±0.005,r=0.03±0.01)(ns=0.965±0.005,r=0.03±0.01), BAO scale, primordial nucleosynthesis abundances (Yp=0.248±0.002)(Yp=0.248±0.002), and resolves the cosmological constant and coincidence problems without fine-tuning. With only five free parameters (H0,Ωm,ns,As,ϵ)(H0,Ωm,ns,As,ϵ), the model yields χ2/dof=1.02±0.03χ2/dof=1.02±0.03, ΔAIC=42ΔAIC=42 relative to ΛCDMΛCDM, demonstrating strong statistical preference. EET-specific testable predictions include the transition redshift zt=0.5±0.05zt=0.5±0.05, hierarchical scaling M(L)∝L2.2±0.1M(L)∝L2.2±0.1, and the no-Big-Rip criterion. The framework unifies cosmic evolution with the same YEC grammar operating across scales, from quantum fluctuations to cognition, via the scaling law τ∝L0.6τ∝L0.6.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hongpu Yang (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c371de0f0f753b39e455https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19258713
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper