PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Scientific journals, networks, flows and metrics: reflections and their implications for the field of Education

View Full Paper
LSLuhilda Ribeiro SilveiraJGJuliana Aparecida Gulka

Key Points

  • This article theorizes the changes in the production and validation of scientific knowledge in education.
  • Theoretical reflection on academic measurement and evaluation systems.
  • Examination of the historical role of scientific journals in knowledge networks.
  • Discussion of CAPES guidelines for evaluating graduate programs.
  • Identifies transformations in scholarly communication due to technological innovation.
  • Highlights the role of metrics in shaping academic reputation.
  • Critiques the limits and tensions within research evaluation systems.

Abstract

This article offers a theoretical reflection on the transformations reshaping the production, circulation, validation, and construction of scientific knowledge within the informational paradigm. It departs from the assumption that technological innovation, articulated with systems of academic measurement and evaluation, reorganizes scholarly communication and confers centrality upon journals not merely as recording media, but as structuring elements of this ecosystem. The article first examines the historical process by which journals consolidated and became embedded in global networks of knowledge circulation. It then discusses the role of these publications in the construction of academic reputation and in the mechanisms of legitimation of scientific production. Finally, it addresses the dynamics of metrics and research evaluation systems, contemplating the specific area guidelines established by CAPES for the evaluation of Master’s and PhD Programs. highlighting their limits, tensions, and effects on editorial practices and academic trajectories. It is argued that this set of processes directly shapes the organization of scholarly communication and the social and institutional conditions under which knowledge is recognized.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Silveira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c553f8fdd13afe0bd3d4https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19296506
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Scientific journals, networks, flows and metrics: reflections and their implications for the field of Education2026
  2. 2The agency of digital platforms in open science: governance, metrics, and ontological implications2025
  3. 3Rewriting the Politics of Publication: Tracking 25 Years of Debate in Academic Reform with Bibliometric Analysis2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Measuring Scholarly Communication in the Era of Data Science2025
  5. 5Scientometrics 2.0: Reconfiguration of Publication Economics and Models of Academic Expertise in Digital Scientific Ecosystems2026