PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma0 citationsOpen Access

Trauma Care: Teaching Recovery Technique (TRT) to Children and Adolescent Refugees: A Systematic Review on Effectiveness

View Full Paper
CWClaudia WildSKSabine KampmüllerPKPetra Krenn-Maritz

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the effectiveness of the Teaching Recovery Technique (TRT) for children and adolescents affected by trauma.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 11 studies including 7 randomised controlled trials and 4 case series.
  • Executed systematic searches across Medline, INAHTA, and Cochrane Library databases.
  • Analyzed outcomes such as PTSD symptoms, psychological distress, and depressive symptoms.
  • TRT significantly reduced PTSD symptoms in participants as shown by improved CRIES-8 and CRIES-13 scores.
  • Average improvement in PTSD scores ranged from 3 to 14 points post-intervention and up to 12 points at follow-up.
  • Evidence for reduced psychological distress and depressive symptoms was less consistent compared to PTSD outcomes.

Abstract

Traumatic experiences are a predictor of ill mental health, in particular posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and anxiety. The Children and War Foundation has developed a trauma-focused cognitive behavioural programme (TF-CBT) – the Teaching Recovery Techniques (TRT) – a group intervention for children and adolescents exposed to war, violence, and displacement. This article aims to review and synthesise the current evidence on the effectiveness of TRT programmes. A systematic review of published studies (RCTs and case series) was conducted based on a systematic search in three databases (Medline via Pubmed, INAHTA, Cochrane Library). Eleven studies were identified: seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and four before–after case series, with 3,149 participants. Across studies, TRT was found to reduce PTSD symptoms, with CRIES-8 or CRIES-13 scores improving between 3- and 14 points post-intervention, and up to 12 points at follow-up (3–6 months). Evidence for reductions in psychological distress and depressive symptoms (measured via SDQ and DSRS) was less consistent. The risk of bias was low to moderate in the studies. The results show consistent effects across studies. The evidence supports the TRT programme as an effective, scalable, and low-cost intervention for reducing trauma symptoms among refugee children and adolescents. Future research should aim to strengthen the evidence base with longer-term outcomes, explore moderators of effect, and enhance inclusion of underrepresented groups such as girls.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wild et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c5c5f8fdd13afe0bdbb6https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-026-00851-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper