Higher baseline Visceral Adiposity Index was independently associated with a 29% decreased likelihood of achieving a positive visual response to anti-VEGF therapy in diabetic macular edema (OR 0.71).
Cohort
No
Is baseline Visceral Adiposity Index associated with resistance to intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema?
298 patients with type 2 diabetes and center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME)
Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (assessed by baseline Visceral Adiposity Index [VAI] as a prognostic marker)
Positive functional response (pre-specified Best-Corrected Visual Acuity [BCVA] improvements at 24 months)
Baseline Visceral Adiposity Index is a strong, independent prognostic marker for resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema, highlighting the impact of systemic metabolic dysfunction on local treatment efficacy.
Background A substantial number of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) exhibit resistance to standard anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy, representing a major clinical challenge. The Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), a surrogate for visceral fat dysfunction and systemic metabolic derangement, has been linked to diabetic microvascular complications, but its power to serve as a prognostic marker for local therapeutic failure in DME is unknown. This study aimed to determine if baseline VAI, as a marker of systemic metabolic dysfunction, is associated with resistance to intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with DME. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed 298 patients with type 2 diabetes and center-involved DME initiating anti-VEGF therapy between January 2022 and December 2023. VAI was calculated at baseline. The primary outcome was a positive functional response, defined by pre-specified Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) improvements at 24 months. Patients not meeting these criteria were classified as exhibiting treatment resistance. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent factors associated with response, ROC curve analysis assessed VAI’s prognostic performance, and Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated time-to-response. Results Patients with treatment resistance (non-responders, 47.0%) had significantly higher baseline VAI scores than responders (4.4 ± 3.0 vs. 2.4 ± 1.9, p0.001). After adjusting for confounders, a higher VAI was independently associated with a greater likelihood of treatment failure (Adjusted OR for positive response = 0.71 per unit increase; 95% CI: 0.61–0.82; p0.001). VAI demonstrated acceptable prognostic ability for resistance (AUC = 0.73), with an optimal cut-off of 2.50. Patients with VAI ≥2.50 had a significantly lower and delayed probability of achieving a positive response (log-rank p 0.0001). Conclusion Baseline VAI is a potent, independent prognostic marker associated with local treatment failure in response to anti-VEGF therapy in DME. This study demonstrates that a measure of systemic metabolic dysfunction can correlate with the efficacy of a localized treatment. VAI is an easily calculated, non-invasive index that can effectively risk-stratify patients, identifying those who may require more intensive or alternative management strategies from the outset to overcome this metabolic resistance.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mi Chen
Ting Jiang
Changbo Hu
Frontiers in Endocrinology
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Central South University
The First People's Hospital of Changde
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Diabetic macular edema (n=298). Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy vs. Low Visceral Adiposity Index was evaluated on Positive functional response (pre-specified BCVA improvements at 24 months) (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.82, p=<0.001). Higher baseline Visceral Adiposity Index was independently associated with a 29% decreased likelihood of achieving a positive visual response to anti-VEGF therapy in diabetic macular edema (OR 0.71).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1210883daed6ee094d8a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1801978
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: