This cross-sectional study evaluated the association between interproximal contact loss (ICL) and peri-implant diseases, determined its prevalence and distribution, and examined relationships with clinical and radiographic variables. Calibrated evaluators examined adult patients with single implant-supported prostheses (ISPs) in non-molar sites. Logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between ICL and peri-implant diseases, as well as with variables of interest. A total of 262 patients with 323 ISPs were evaluated. Mean follow-up time since implant placement was 11.2±1.5 years. ICL was observed in 43.6% of mesial and 34.6% of distal sites at the implant level (p=0.03), and in 62.6% of participants. Open mesial and distal contacts were associated with increased odds of peri-implantitis (OR=1.648, p=0.045; OR=1.938, p=0.004). Light mesial contacts were also associated with a higher risk of presenting this disease (OR=2.214, p=0.008). Marginal bone loss was associated with light mesial (OR=1.104, p=0.009) and with both open (OR = 1.175, p = 0.008) and light distal contacts (OR = 1.181, p = 0.009). Food impaction was associated with open (OR=10.555, p=0.003), light mesial (OR=12.210, p=0.002), and light distal contacts (OR=5.999, p=0.006). At mesial sites, open contacts were further associated with reduced interproximal soft tissue height and a history of periodontitis (OR=10.641, p=0.036). In conclusion, ICLs are highly prevalent and associated with peri-implantitis, Marginal bone loss, food impaction, reduced papilla height, and a history of periodontitis.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emilio Couso-Queiruga
Clemens Raabe
Gemma Rubio-Ferrer
The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Couso-Queiruga et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1280883daed6ee094f4d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.8056
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: