Pulse nav.journalClub Tendencias Explorar Preguntas Investigadores

© Synapse Social LLC, 2026Política de privacidad

⌘+K

RIRS vs PCNL in treating lower-pole renal stones: a comparative clinical outcome study | Synapse

March 30, 2026Open Access

RIRS vs PCNL in treating lower-pole renal stones: a comparative clinical outcome study

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Puntos clave

The aim is to compare the clinical outcomes of RIRS and PCNL in treating lower-pole renal stones.
Reviewed clinical outcomes of RIRS and PCNL treatments
Assessed perioperative profiles including morbidity and recovery times
Evaluated stone clearance rates for both methods
PCNL shows better stone clearance for stones 1-2 cm in size
RIRS demonstrates lower morbidity and faster recovery times
Treatment selection is case-dependent, balancing stone clearance and patient risk

Resumen

PCNL is better used in the treatment of inferior pole renal stones not exceeding 1-2 cm in size and RIRS is better in terms of perioperative profile (lowest morbidity, faster recovery). The selection of treatment must be made on a case-by-case basis with a trade-off between the greatest clearance of the stone and the risk inherent in the treatment and characteristics of the patient.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Loading...

Authors

S

Samer Fathi Al-Rawashdah

Mutah University

Journals

Future Science OA

Actions

Institutions

Mutah University

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Loading...

Cite this study

Samer Fathi Al-Rawashdah (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca12d4883daed6ee09515e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20565623.2026.2646277