Abstract Corn ( Zea mays L .) response to sulfur (S) fertilizations remains difficult to assess due to the dynamic nature of S availability. This study evaluated corn response and diagnostic tools across 30 field sites in Kansas (Experiment 1; with and without S) and in complementary rate trials at two sites (Experiment 2; multiple S rates). Measurements included normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil plant analysis development (SPAD), tissue S concentrations at various growth stages, grain S concentration, total S uptake, and yield. Sulfur fertilization increased tissue S concentration and uptake across stages, but yield responses were generally low. SPAD at R1 and tissue S concentrations outperformed NDVI and soil sulfate, although the diagnostic value was inconsistent. Grain yield and total S uptake showed a strong relationship, requiring 1.5 kg S uptake Mg −1 grain. In the rate study, yield followed a plateau response, and the agronomic optimum S rate was estimated at 21 kg ha −1 using model averaging of linear and quadratic plateau functions, while the 95% confidence interval (12–42 kg ha −1 ) was obtained using bootstrap aggregation. Efficiency metrics varied widely: agronomic and recovery efficiencies were low in nonresponsive sites but improved at lower rates in responsive environments, while internal efficiency averaged 619 kg grain kg −1 S uptake. Hierarchical Bayesian dilution models yielded a critical S concentration curve (S C = 2.05 × biomass −0.2 ) and a nitrogen‐to‐sulfur (N:S) ratio curve (N:S R = 15.59 × biomass −0.08 ), providing a physiological framework for in‐season diagnosis. Overall, moderate, well‐targeted S rates, combined with tissue diagnostics and dilution curves, can guide strategies to enhance S efficiency and management in corn.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gustavo A. Roa
Dorivar A. Ruiz Diaz
Agronomy Journal
Kansas State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Roa et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb64d4e6a8c024954b8ea1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70337