PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026Gender Work and Organization0 citations

A Study on Constructing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Indicators From the Perspective of Organizational Justice

View Full Paper
YCYin‐Che ChenYCYu‐Yun Chien

Key Points

  • The central aim is to create a structured indicator system for measuring diversity, equity, and inclusion informed by organizational justice theory.
  • Conducted a modified Delphi study with 29 HR practitioners to refine indicators.
  • Integrated organizational justice theory with existing disclosure frameworks.
  • Used fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to prioritize indicators based on expert consensus.
  • Developed a comprehensive DEI indicator system with justice-informed dimensions.
  • Established empirically derived priorities for effective DEI governance in organizations.
  • Provided a replicable framework adaptable to various industries and local contexts.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Diversity, equity, and inclusion has become a central concern for organizations seeking fair and sustainable workforce governance, yet comparable and practice‐ready measurement remains uneven across contexts. Grounded in organizational justice theory, this study develops a structured DEI indicator system and prioritizes indicators using expert consensus and fuzzy multicriteria weighting. We integrated organizational justice scholarship with internationally recognized disclosure frameworks and Taiwan's labor‐related regulatory context to generate an initial indicator pool. A modified Delphi study with 29 human resource practitioners from Taiwan's high‐tech industry was conducted to refine and validate the indicators, followed by the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to derive indicator weights. The resulting framework specifies justice‐informed DEI dimensions and provides empirically derived priorities that support organizational diagnosis, resource allocation, and policy design. By linking a justice‐based conceptual foundation to a transparent, replicable weighting procedure and actionable recommendations, this study offers an evaluation model that can be adapted for DEI governance across industries while remaining sensitive to local institutional settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb64f0e6a8c024954b8fb5https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70137
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper