PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Hodge Structure and Gauge Equivalence of ℓ¹ Defect Fields

View Full Paper
JCJEREMY H. CARROLL

Key Points

  • The central aim is to investigate the cohomological structure of defect fields under ℓ¹ geometry and its implications for gauge equivalence.
  • Examined cohomological structure of defect fields on finite graphs using ℓ¹ geometry.
  • Defined a norm on H¹(G) through the minimization of an ℓ¹ functional.
  • Characterized the relationship between ℓ¹ and ℓ² structures regarding cost and projections.
  • Showed that ℓ² Hodge projections typically inflate ℓ¹ cost, with an explicit inflation ratio of 3 − 2/n on cycle graphs.
  • Established that the norm Φ is uniquely determined by the quotient construction of defect measures.
  • Derived a connection between Φ and dual norms of circulations using linear programming.

Abstract

This paper studies the cohomological structure of defect fields on finite graphs under the ℓ¹ geometry established in preceding work. Classical discrete Hodge theory provides an ℓ²-orthogonal decomposition of 1-cochains into exact and harmonic components. However, this decomposition is not compatible with ℓ¹ geometry: the ℓ² projection onto harmonic representatives does not, in general, minimize ℓ¹ cost within a cohomology class. We therefore consider the ℓ¹ quotient functional Φ(δ) = min over f in C⁰ of ||δ − d₀f||₁, and show that it defines a norm on H¹(G) and serves as the canonical gauge-invariant measure of defect magnitude induced by the ℓ¹ geometry. In particular, among norms on cohomology arising from the ℓ¹ structure on cochains, Φ is uniquely determined by the quotient construction. We quantify the mismatch between ℓ¹ and ℓ² structures by proving that ℓ² Hodge projections generically inflate ℓ¹ cost, with an explicit ratio of 3 − 2/n on cycle graphs. We further characterize Φ via linear programming duality as the dual norm of bounded divergence-free circulations, connecting cohomology, network flows, and total variation minimization. The results provide a structural interpretation of ℓ¹ optimization on graphs as a cohomological invariant, completing a sequence of works showing that ℓ¹ geometry governs the measurement, aggregation, and decomposition of defect fields across combinatorial, functional, and dynamical settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

JEREMY H. CARROLL (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb64f0e6a8c024954b8fe8https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19323371
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper