PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth0 citationsOpen Access

Normal Modes in a Coupled Earth Model: A New Perspective on the Compliance Method

View Full Paper
TTToshiro Tanimoto

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop a new normal-mode approach for analyzing compliance parameters in a coupled Earth model.
  • Developed a normal-mode approach incorporating the atmosphere and solid Earth.
  • Calculated group velocity without the variational principle.
  • Defined compliance parameters using frequency and power spectral densities.
  • Compared normal-mode and pressure-loading approaches for compliance and depth sensitivity.
  • Findings indicate close agreement between normal-mode and pressure-loading approaches.
  • The phase velocity was crucial for matching results between models.
  • The pressure-loading method proved more computationally efficient for structural inversion.

Abstract

Abstract To understand the compliance parameters observed for atmospheric pressure waves, we develop a normal‐mode approach for a coupled Earth model that includes the atmosphere and the solid Earth. Extending the method of Press and Harkrider to a coupled Earth model, we introduce two new features. First, we present a technique for computing group velocity in a coupled Earth model without relying on the variational principle. Second, we develop a framework for calculating a theoretical compliance parameter by the normal‐mode approach, defined as , where is frequency, is the power spectral density of vertical displacement, and is that of surface pressure. Previous studies have modeled crustal deformation as a pressure‐loading problem caused by atmospheric pressure. In contrast, the normal‐mode approach treats this deformation as intrinsic to the eigenfunctions of modes in a coupled Earth system. We compare the normal‐mode and pressure‐loading approaches by computing compliance parameters and their depth sensitivity kernels within the solid Earth. The results show close agreement, provided that the phase velocity of the corresponding normal mode is used as the pressure‐wave speed in the pressure‐loading model. They justify the use of the pressure‐loading approach for structural inversion, which offers significantly greater computational efficiency than the normal‐mode approach.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Toshiro Tanimoto (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb6b416edfba7beb88618https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jb032779
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper