PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Journal of High Energy Physics1 citationsOpen Access

Complete light long-lived particles searches in Type-I 2HDM

XQXueying QiHSH. Y. SongWSWei Su

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze the parameter space of the Type-I Two-Higgs-Doublet Model for light long-lived particles.
  • Full parameter space analysis of Type-I two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM)
  • Imposition of theoretical constraints like vacuum stability and perturbative unitarity
  • Identification of experimental bounds for light scalar and pseudoscalar particles
  • Proposition of four benchmark regions for light long-lived particles
  • Identification of viable regions for light long-lived particles (LLPs)
  • Benchmark regions accommodate both light LLPs and measured W boson mass
  • FASER 2 project significantly improves sensitivity by about two orders of magnitude over FASER

Abstract

A bstract Recently, the study of long-lived particles (LLPs) has attracted increasing attention. In this work, we analyze the full parameter space of the Type-I Two-Higgs-Doublet Model (2HDM) that allows for light long-lived scalar (H) and pseudoscalar (A) particles. When involving a light beyongd Standard Model (BSM) Higgs, the ∆ S could be the main contribution during the global fit of the oblique parameters, which is different to ∆ T being the main factor for heavy BSM Higgs cases. By imposing theoretical constraints such as vacuum stability and perturbative unitarity, together with current experimental bounds, we summarize a complete region for a potential light H with cos (β − α) ≃ 1 1 tan β, light A with cos (β − α) ≃ 1 2mH²-{mₕ²}mH²-{mₕ²} 1 tan β 2 m H 2 − m h 2 m H 2 − m h 2, and point out the invisible Higgs decay is the most important constraint. We further identify viable regions for LLPs and propose four benchmark regions that simultaneously accommodate a light long-lived particle and the CDF-II measured W boson mass. For these benchmarks, we present the reaches of FASER and FASER 2, where FASER 2 improves the sensitivity by approximately two orders of magnitude compared to FASER.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb6b416edfba7beb8862chttps://doi.org/10.1007/jhep03(2026)259
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper