Soft-ground-story configurations in high-rise buildings present a critical vulnerability during seismic events, often leading to disproportionate structural damage and collapse. This study focuses on the systematic identification of soft-ground-story high-rise structures in Bucharest, a city located in a high seismic hazard zone influenced by Vrancea intermediate-depth earthquakes. The research employs a multi-step methodology combining field surveys, structural documentation, and analysis of architectural layouts from various sources to detect soft-ground-story irregularities across the urban building stock in Bucharest. The findings reveal that such configurations remain prevalent in mixed-use structures along major boulevards, where open ground floors were historically favoured for commercial purposes. The results provide a database of soft-ground-story high-rise buildings in Bucharest, highlighting their prevalence in distinct urban districts and their potential impact on seismic risk. Quantitative screening indicators, vertical element area ratio and mean axial stress in ground-story columns, are proposed for rapid vulnerability assessment. Dynamic measurements confirm a 33–38% increase in fundamental eigenperiods after the 1977 earthquake, indicating moderate-to-extensive damage states. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted retrofitting strategies and inform seismic risk mitigation policies. The study provides a foundation for future integration of advanced diagnostic tools, such as image-based deep learning and vibration monitoring, into citywide seismic resilience planning.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Florin Pavel
Applied Sciences
Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Florin Pavel (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb7b016edfba7beb89ca2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073360
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: