PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Journal of Chinese Writing Systems0 citations

Revised engraving and original engraving of the Eulogy for Emperor Daozong in Khitan small script

View Full Paper
BBademachaoYWYingzhe Wu

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare revised and original engravings of the Eulogy for Emperor Daozong to identify reasons for revisions.
  • Conducted a detailed comparison of rubbings and original inscriptions.
  • Performed an in-depth textual analysis of revised and original engravings.
  • Investigated pronunciation and meaning of relevant words.
  • Identified mis-engravings, spelled-form writings, revision of glyphs, and grammatical errors as key causes for revisions.
  • Discovered that certain words may share etymological roots with Mongolic languages.

Abstract

There are some passages that were revised in the existing Khitan small script epitaphs and eulogys, such as the Eulogy for Emperor Daozong and the Epitaph of the Late Mme . Yelü . Especially in the former one, the revised part is relatively large, consisting of as many as 9 lines, with more than 180 words in total. Regarding the reasons for revision, the differences between the revised and original engravings, as well as the pronunciation and meaning of related words, previous scholars believed that they only involve the differences in line indentation and respectful spacing. Through a detailed comparison between the rubbings and the original inscription, as well as an in-depth textual collation of the revised and original engravings, the authors have found that mis-engravings, spelled-form writings, revision of glyphs, and grammatical errors are the fundamental causes for the revision of this eulogy. At the same time, the authors further conclude through research that the etymology of the words meaning “order (of years)” and “temporary burial” in the Khitan small script may be cognate with Mongolic.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bademachao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7ab35652765b073a814ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/25138502261426572
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Further Discussion on the Pronunciation and Meanings of Some Graphemes of Khitan Large Script (Sequel II)2025
  2. 2Master Yin’s Mellifluous Chanting: Daoist Scripture Recitation in Tang Dynasty Epigraphy2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3An Examination of the Liye No. 8-461 ‘Wooden Tablet of Nomenclature Changes’ and Its Implications for the Traditional View of the First Emperor’s (259–210 BCE) ‘Unification of Script’2024
  4. 4[Articles] The Structure and Significance of Imperial Funeral Rites During the Song 宋 Dynasty: A Comparative Study with the Yili 儀禮 and the DaTang Yuanling Yizhu 大唐元陵儀注2025
  5. 5Epigraphic Layering and Dual Voices: Front–Back Discourse in Ming Earthquake Stelae from Shanxi (1556)2025