PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026City and Environment Interactions2 citationsOpen Access

Urban air quality shifts under lockdown restrictions: assessing the role of policy stringency in Dhaka’s COVID-19 anthropause

View Full Paper
MZMaheen ZamanMZMd. Ahnaf ZamanNCNasif Chowdhury

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze changes in air quality in Dhaka during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and the effects of various policy measures.
  • Gathered pollutant levels (PM 2.5, PM 10, NO 2, SO 2, O 3, CO) before, during, and after lockdown.
  • Forecasted Air Quality Index (AQI) levels using historical data from before the pandemic.
  • Conducted statistical testing to examine the relationship between meteorological factors and AQI changes.
  • Employed Random Forest model and ridge regression to identify policy measures affecting air quality.
  • Significant reductions in NO 2 (−20.77%), PM 10 (−11.47%), SO 2 (−12.85%), and CO (−9.03%).
  • O 3 levels increased by 2.35%, while PM 2.5 showed an insignificant decline (−16.44%).
  • Observed AQI value (107.74) was better than the forecasted value (122.24–124.32), indicating substantial improvement.
  • Stay-at-home orders and closures of schools and workplaces were most linked to AQI reductions.

Abstract

This study examines changes in air quality during anthropogenic restrictions in Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the COVID-19 lockdown, with an emphasis on variations associated with reduced human activity. The pollutant levels of PM 2.5 , PM 10 , NO 2 , SO 2 , O 3 , and CO were collected and compared before, during, and after lockdown. Significant reductions were observed in NO 2 (−20.77%), PM 10 (−11.47%), SO 2 (−12.85%), and CO (−9.03%), but O 3 increased by 2.35%. PM 2.5 levels exhibited a statistically insignificant decline (−16.44%). To evaluate whether the observed changes deviated from historical patterns, Air Quality Index (AQI) levels for 2020 were forecasted using pre-pandemic data. The forecasts indicated AQI values in the range of 122.24–124.32, compared to the observed value of 107.74 during the same period, suggesting that the improvement in air quality exceeded typical variations. The potential role of meteorological factors was further examined through statistical testing and causality analysis. Although some weather variables showed temporal variation, no significant causal relationships with AQI were identified within the study period, indicating a limited explanatory role relative to other factors. Finally, to determine which policy measures were most strongly associated with changes in air quality, the Random Forest model and ridge regression analysis were employed. The findings consistently identify stay-at-home requirements and the closure of schools and workplaces as the measures most strongly associated with reductions in AQI, with additional contributions from transport and gathering restrictions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zaman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7ab35652765b073a81behttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2026.100355
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper