PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Социодинамика0 citationsOpen Access

"Heilongjiang" or "Amur"? The Competition of Historical Memories and the Formation of a Transnational Social Space on the China-Russia Border

View Full Paper
ZWZelin Wang

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how historical memories compete and shape a transnational social space along the China-Russia border.
  • Historical-comparative analysis of treaties and memory narratives
  • Examination of modern practices such as tourism and cultural exchanges
  • Analysis of empirical examples from border regions
  • Historical narratives reveal contrasting views on territorial loss and statehood development.
  • Modern practices like tourism and festivals foster social ties and economic interdependence.
  • Infrastructure projects enhance cooperation between the two countries.

Abstract

The subject of the research is the competition of historical memories and the formation of a transnational social space along the China-Russia border by the Amur River (Heilongjiang). The object of the study includes the border regions of Russia and China, including the Zabaykalsk-Manchuria and Blagoveshchensk-Heihe areas, where economic, humanitarian, and cultural interactions develop over a distance of approximately 2,661 km. The author examines in detail aspects of the topic such as the stages of border formation (the Nerchinsk Treaty of 1689, the Aigun and Peking Treaties of 1858–1860), the dual toponym of the river as a symbol of national memory, and social memories of conflicts and resettlements. Special attention is paid to the competition of narratives in memory politics, textbooks, museums, and media, as well as their influence on contemporary practices of tourism, trade, and cultural exchanges that promote transnational integration. The methodology of the research is based on historical-comparative analysis of treaties, memory narratives, and modern practices, relying on literature and empirical examples of border interaction. The novelty of the study lies in the comprehensive analysis of the dual toponym "Amur/Heilongjiang" as a symbol of the competition of historical memories, where the Chinese narrative emphasizes "territorial loss" through unequal treaties (Aigun, Peking), while the Russian narrative focuses on the development of the Far East as an expansion of statehood. This allows for the uncovering of the mechanism of forming a transnational social space, where memory ceases to be a source of conflict and becomes a resource for cooperation. The main conclusions of the conducted research are: historical memory transforms through modern practices—tourism with museums and monuments reflecting both versions of history; cross-border trade stimulating economic interdependence; cultural festivals, exchanges of "sister cities," and joint archaeological expeditions that reduce tensions. Infrastructure projects, such as the Nizhnelininskoye-Tunjiang Bridge, play a significant role in strengthening social ties.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zelin Wang (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7ab35652765b073a81cfhttps://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2026.3.77730
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper