PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026BMJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating outcomes of psychological support services in minimum security prisons in England: a quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching and survival analysis

View Full Paper
GMGeorgina MathlinHJHannah JonesCLCarine Lewis

Key Points

  • To assess the outcomes of psychological support services for individuals with personality disorders at risk of reoffending in minimum security prisons.
  • Quasi-experimental retrospective cohort design
  • Used routine PERS and UK Ministry of Justice data
  • Matched 258 PERS users with 358 non-PERS controls based on various factors
  • PERS users had a longer wait for community release (HR=0.16)
  • Lower likelihood of returning to closed prison conditions (HR=0.73)
  • Findings suggest a potential positive impact of PERS on confinement duration

Abstract

Objectives To test whether individuals identified as having a likely personality disorder and high reoffending risk, who opted in to psychologically informed support in minimum security prisons (Pathways Enhanced Resettlement Service (PERS)), were (a) less likely to return to more restrictive closed prison conditions, and (b) released to the community sooner, compared with matched non-PERS users. Design Quasi-experimental retrospective cohort design using routine PERS and UK Ministry of Justice administrative data, for all clients enrolled on PERS between 1 April 2019 and 30 April 2022. Setting Five minimum security male prisons in England. Participants 258 PERS users matched for ethnicity, age at first offence and sentencing, education, sentence type, personality disorder screening, risk of reoffending scores and historical drug and alcohol use to 358 controls. Intervention PERS. Results PERS users waited longer for community release (HR=0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.71) and had a lower likelihood of return to closed conditions prisons (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99) than matched controls. Conclusions PERS supports individuals to remain in open conditions for longer; however, further evaluation is needed to understand why PERS users waited longer for release, and if this was associated with a more successful release, without return to prison or reoffence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mathlin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7ab35652765b073a81fdhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110540
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Staff and Service User Experiences of Specialist Open Prison Personality Disorder Services: How do Pathways Enhanced Resettlement Services Support Progression?2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Crisis in UK prison mental health2017 · 8 citations
  3. 3Inference and missing data1976 · 9,834 citations
  4. 4survminer: Drawing Survival Curves using 'ggplot2'2016 · 1,207 citations
  5. 5Personality Disorders, Violence, and Antisocial Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis2012 · 281 citations