PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026International Journal of Eating Disorders1 citationsOpen Access

Safeguarding Online Research in Eating Disorders Against Fraud: Increasing Risks and Practical Recommendations

View Full Paper
JPJamie‐Lee PennesiMPMia L. PellizzerTWTracey D. Wade

Key Points

  • The research aims to address the rise of fraudulent participants in online eating disorder studies and propose solutions.
  • Conducted a Delphi consensus study with 138 English-speaking individuals aged 18 and older.
  • Implemented multiple fraud prevention strategies during the study.
  • Introduced a three-step procedure for managing fraudulent participants.
  • Identified fraudulent sign-ups despite existing prevention strategies.
  • Additional measures like reCAPTCHA and consistency checks reduced further fraudulent registrations.
  • Manual review of survey data enhanced the identification of suspected fraudulent participants.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Recent growth of online research has been accompanied by an increase in reports of fraudulent participants, which can significantly comprise research validity. Drawing from our experience using Qualtrics with open recruitment, existing literature, and emerging studies in eating disorders (ED), we outline the risk and provide simple, practical recommendations for preventing, detecting, and managing fraudulent participants in online ED research. Method Over the conduct of a three‐round Delphi consensus study with 138 English‐speaking individuals aged 18 and older, we were inundated with fraudulent sign‐ups between July and August 2024, despite implementing multiple fraud prevention strategies. In response, we introduced additional fraud mitigation strategies and established a three‐step procedure for identifying and managing fraudulent participants. Results The additional fraud mitigation measures, including a second reCAPTCHA, a duplicate question for consistency checks, and modified attention check questions, potentially aided in preventing further fraudulent sign‐ups. Our procedure involving manual comprehensive review of all incoming survey data and checks against a fraudulent participants' profile enabled us to identify and withdraw suspected or likely fraudulent participants. Discussion With increasing fraudulent participation rates and rapidly advancing technological advancements such as artificial intelligence, all online studies are at risk and researchers need to be proactive in their use of antifraud practices to safeguard online research. Our practical recommendations can assist future researchers in managing fraudulent participants.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pennesi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7ad45652765b073a8566https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70083
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Survey sabotage: Insights into reducing the risk of fraudulent responses in online surveys2025 · 20 citations
  2. 2Mortality and mental health funding—do the dollars add up? Eating disorder research funding in Australia from 2009 to 2021: a portfolio analysis2023 · 24 citations
  3. 3Trap questions in online surveys: Results from three web survey experiments2018 · 103 citations
  4. 4Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories2004 · 635 citations
  5. 5Social media recruitment and online data collection: A beginner’s guide and best practices for accessing low-prevalence and hard-to-reach populations.2014 · 283 citations