PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Heritage0 citationsOpen Access

A Methodological Path to Assess the Out-of-Plane Vulnerability of Archaeological Walls in the Pompeii Archaeological Park

View Full Paper
MLMarco Di LudovicoCCClaudia CasapullaFCFrancesca Ceroni

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a methodology for assessing the vulnerability of archaeological walls to out-of-plane (OOP) failures.
  • Proposes a two-level classification of archaeological walls based on morphology and connection types.
  • First level identifies recurring typologies using geometrical data from maps and surveys.
  • Second level evaluates effectiveness by investigating construction techniques.
  • Identifies common OOP failure mechanisms for different wall typologies.
  • Suggests suitable analytical models for predicting wall behavior under horizontal actions.

Abstract

In archaeological contexts, isolated or poorly connected masonry elements are very common due to the absence of floors and weak connections between walls. As a result, under horizontal actions, vulnerability to out-of-plane (OOP) failures often becomes the most critical issue for their preservation. As is well-known, limit analysis-based approaches provide a reliable assessment of the expected OOP failure mechanisms and the associated acceleration capacity for existing masonry buildings. However, these approaches mainly refer to box-type buildings and cannot be directly applied to archaeological remains, whose morphology may differ significantly. With a specific focus on the Pompeii Archaeological Park (PAP), this study proposes a two-level classification of archaeological walls aimed at identifying their most likely OOP failure mechanisms and the most suitable analytical models available in the literature to predict their behaviour. The first level identifies recurring typologies based on the morphology of wall connections, relying on geometrical data that can be easily obtained from maps and/or on-site surveys. The second level then evaluates the effectiveness of these connections by investigating their construction techniques. The paper, therefore, proposes a general methodology for assessing the vulnerability of archaeological masonry walls to OOP failure mechanisms and discusses its application to some walls in the PAP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ludovico et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7af55652765b073a89e0https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9040141
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A comprehensive approach to assess the seismic vulnerability of archaeological sites: the Wupatki Pueblo in Arizona2024 · 25 citations
  2. 2Fragility curves for out-of-plane failure mechanisms of masonry wall typologies in the archaeological sites: A focus on T-shaped elements in Pompeii2025 · 3 citations
  3. 3Mechanical performance of full-scale Pompeii-like masonry panels2020 · 16 citations
  4. 4The stone skeleton1966 · 908 citations
  5. 5A Multilevel Approach to Monitor the Archaeological Park of Pompeii2024 · 2 citations