PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Journal of Phycology0 citations

Increased prey choice is associated with higher kleptoplastidic reliance in Mesodinium ciliates

View Full Paper
ALAmelie L'Etoile‐GogaHMHolly V. Moeller

Key Points

  • The research explores how kleptoplastidic Mesodinium ciliates select prey types based on plastid reliance.
  • Conducted experiments with two Mesodinium species, M. rubrum and M. chamaeleon.
  • Offered a choice of two cryptophyte prey species simultaneously.
  • Measured Mesodinium and prey population dynamics across six combinations.
  • M. rubrum exhibited greater selectivity for prey than M. chamaeleon.
  • M. rubrum could not fully select compatible prey types during feeding.
  • While M. rubrum's growth was unaffected by prey type, M. chamaeleon showed limited growth effects.

Abstract

Abstract Kleptoplastidic organisms display varying levels of reliance on stolen plastids, with some lineages evolving complex strategies for plastid (and other organelle) integration into metabolism. More complex methods of plastid integration typically coincide with greater prey specialization, but it remains unclear whether or how kleptoplastidic lineages preferentially obtain organelles from compatible prey types. Here, we used the Mesodinium genus of ciliates, which span a gradient of reliance on kleptoplasty, to test for prey specialization during ingestion. We used two Mesodinum species: a highly kleptoplastidic species, M. rubrum , and a more mixotrophic species, M. chamaeleon . We conducted a series of experiments offering Mesodinium two different cryptophyte prey species simultaneously. Mesodinium and cryptophyte prey populations were measured across six different prey combinations. We observed that M. rubrum showed greater prey selectivity than M. chamaeleon at the time of ingestion. Despite this greater selectivity, M. rubrum was still unable to completely select for compatible prey types during feeding. Growth of M. rubrum was not affected by prey type over the course of this study, while limited effects on the growth of M. chamaeleon were seen. Preferential feeding by M. rubrum suggests the presence of a prey identification system that is not present in M. chamaeleon , consistent with our hypothesis that prey selectivity increases with increased reliance on kleptoplasty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

L'Etoile‐Goga et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7b345652765b073a9112https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.70161
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Species‐Specific Prey Preference and Behavioral Responses to <i>Tetraselmis</i> Chloroplast Donors in the Euglenoid <i>Rapaza viridis</i>2026
  2. 2Emergent metabolic parasitism driven by organelle sequestration2026
  3. 3Exploring the roles of trophic mode and microbial prey size in grazing pathways of tropical oligotrophic waters of the eastern Indian Ocean2025
  4. 4Grazing Responses of Distinct-Sized Tropical Cladocerans to Different Filamentous Sizes of the Cyanobacterium Dolichospermum planctonicum2026
  5. 5Polychaete capture by native jellyfish and invasive ctenophore reveals a novel benthic pelagic trophic link2025