PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Journal of the history of philosophy0 citations

Spinoza: Scholarship Since 2000

View Full Paper
SNSteven Nadler

Key Points

  • The aim is to survey key developments in Spinoza scholarship since 2000, focusing on notable works and translations.
  • Conducted a partial survey of Spinoza literature published since 2000.
  • Highlighted developments based on personal interests and preferences.
  • Provided a new translation of the herem issued against Spinoza.
  • Identified impressive developments in Spinoza research since 2000.
  • Noted that various works worthy of mention were excluded due to bias.
  • Introduced a more accurate translation of Spinoza's herem.

Abstract

abstract: In this essay, I highlight some of the most auspicious and impressive developments in Spinoza research since 2000. This is at best a partial survey, in both senses of the term. First, it is fairly subjective, reflecting my own interests and preferences. Second, given how much has been published on Spinoza in the past quarter century, there are many items that warrant mention that have not been included. Moreover, I limit my discussion to the literature in languages with which I feel safe in assuming most readers of this journal are familiar. I also offer a new, more accurate translation of the herem (ban) issued against Spinoza, to replace the variety of translations that have circulated for years.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Steven Nadler (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7b475652765b073a9313https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2026.a986607
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper