PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Journal of Orthodontics0 citations

A novel aesthetic technique for alignment of an impacted anterior tooth: A case report

View Full Paper
MMMolly Ailsa McClearySSSaskia Andrea SchwabeDWDeryn Waring

Key Points

  • To present an aesthetic solution for the alignment of an impacted anterior tooth while minimizing the effects of root resorption.
  • Case report of a 13-year-old with impacted maxillary canines and an unerupted tooth.
  • Multidisciplinary approach to treatment involving orthodontic and restorative techniques.
  • Exposure of the impacted tooth and alignment into the adjacent position with a novel pontic design.
  • Successful alignment of the impacted tooth into the adjacent position was achieved.
  • Novel pontic design allowed for orthodontic traction while maintaining aesthetic appearance.
  • Significant improvement in dental aesthetics and function was noted following treatment.

Abstract

Introduction: Impacted anterior teeth are common, with sequalae including root resorption of adjacent or nearby teeth. Management depends on patient- and tooth-specific factors; however, in cases of severe resorption, elective tooth loss may be favoured. This case discusses an aesthetic solution to disimpaction of an anterior tooth, involving multidisciplinary input. Patient concerns: A girl aged 13 years 10 months presented to an orthodontic department, complaining of missing teeth and poor dental aesthetics. Clinical findings: Class II division 1 incisor relationship on a Class I skeletal base, complicated by unerupted maxillary canines (UR3, UL3), retained URC and potential for severe crowding in the upper arch. Radiographic assessment confirmed impacted maxillary canines and an unerupted supernumerary tooth lying palatal to UR1. The impacted UR3 had caused significant root resorption to the UR1. Interventions: After a multidisciplinary discussion, the impacted UR3 was exposed and aligned into the UR1 position, with elective loss of the resorbed UR1. A novel pontic design, incorporating a traction spring, was used, enabling maintenance of a pontic in-situ while simultaneously allowing for orthodontic traction of the UR3. Restorative input after debond disguised the UR3 as the UR1. Outcomes: UR3 was successfully disimpacted and aligned into the UR1 position with the use of a novel pontic design. Conclusion: This case delivers a novel solution to a complex aesthetic dilemma in the anterior dentition that can be modified, and adapted, to suit other anterior impactions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McCleary et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7e935652765b073a996ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/14653125261433571
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper