PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Communications Earth & Environment0 citationsOpen Access

Recent cloud trends and extremes reaffirm established bounds on cloud feedback and aerosol-cloud interactions

View Full Paper
MZMark D. ZelinkaTMTimothy A. MyersYQYi Qin

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand the relationship between recent cloud changes and Earth's energy imbalance.
  • Quantified interannual cloud-radiative anomalies
  • Analyzed meteorological factors contributing to extreme cloud changes
  • Assessed the impact of sulfate aerosol concentration decline on cloud reflection
  • Earth's energy imbalance reached a record level in 2023
  • Declining sulfate aerosols contributed to decreased cloud reflection over 22 years
  • Cloud feedback remains consistent with previous studies, with equilibrium climate sensitivity around 3°C

Abstract

Earth’s energy imbalance has increased markedly over the past two decades, reaching a record in 2023. Both the long-term trend and year-to-year variations are linked to reduced reflection of sunlight by low-level clouds, which is pronounced over Northern Hemisphere oceans. However, the causes of these cloud changes and their implications for future Earth system evolution are unknown, raising concerns about a stronger-than-expected cloud feedback. Here we quantify the meteorological factors behind interannual cloud-radiative anomalies, several of which aligned to produce the extreme 2023 value. These meteorological variations are superposed on a background of declining sulfate aerosol concentrations, contributing to a sustained decrease in cloud reflection over the past 22 years. The resulting constraints on cloud feedback and aerosol forcing are consistent with previous studies, supporting an equilibrium climate sensitivity near 3∘C (likely range 2.7–4.1∘C). Thus, recent observations do not indicate an emerging stronger cloud feedback or underestimated future warming. Cloud feedback does not exceed prior expectations, given the evidence that the cloud-radiative anomalies can be explained by meteorological variations and aerosol emission reduction, according to quantifications based on observations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zelinka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf58cb5a333a8214609acdhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03461-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper