PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Pose error real-time prediction and compensation of a 5-DOF hybrid robot based on laser tracker and externally mounted encoders

HGHao GuoGLG. LISLSongtao Liu

Key Points

  • The aim is to devise a method for predicting and compensating pose error in a hybrid robot using encoder and tracker data.
  • Utilized offline data from a laser tracker and online data from externally mounted encoders.
  • Implemented a moving least squares algorithm for pose error calculation.
  • Conducted error compensation during every interpolation cycle in the NC system.
  • Residual inaccuracy of pose error prediction was reduced by 61% compared to offline-only estimates.
  • Predicted error deviations remained within 5% of actual errors under a constant load.

Abstract

Error compensation is an effective approach for robots to improve accuracy. This paper presents a novel method to predict and compensate for pose error of a 5-DOF hybrid robot on-line with the usage of externally mounted encoders, concentrating particularly on compensating dynamic errors on the account of changes in external forces or disturbances. A novel method to estimate pose error is proposed employing the offline sampling data from a laser tracker as well as the online measurement data from the external encoders. A real-time procedure for pose error prediction and compensation is applied into the NC system, which involves two successive steps: (1) calculation of pose error based on the online measurement from externally mounted encoders and the offline data measured by the laser tracker employing the moving least squares algorithm, and (2) compensation for the command pose in every interpolation cycle. Experimental verification shows that the residual inaccuracy of pose error prediction is reduced by 61% with respect to that only estimated from offline data under the condition of changing loads and the deviations of predicted errors respect to actual errors are within 5% under a constant load.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5cb15a333a821460a4dbhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42162-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper