PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026AgriEngineering0 citationsOpen Access

Semantic Segmentation of Coffee Crops with PlanetScope Images: A Comparative Analysis of Spectral Band Combinations for U-Net Architecture

View Full Paper
DLDaniel Henrique LeiteDVDomingos Sárvio Magalhães ValentePAPedro Maya Ferreira Arruda

Key Points

  • The study evaluates how different spectral band combinations influence U-Net's performance in segmenting coffee crops.
  • Evaluated five spectral band combinations using U-Net for coffee crop segmentation
  • Utilized seven PlanetScope images from Matas de Minas, Brazil, covering different phenological stages
  • Divided images into 316 training patches and 25 test patches of 256 × 256 pixels
  • Visible spectrum combination (B, G, R) achieved an overall accuracy of 0.8669
  • F1-score for Coffee Crops class was 0.8682 with an IoU of 0.7671
  • NIR-inclusive configurations performed worse due to increased spectral confusion
  • Cultivated area overestimation was 18.3% due to mixed pixels from lower resolution

Abstract

Coffee is among the primary agricultural commodities in international trade; however, mapping coffee crops in mountainous regions faces limitations due to high spectral variability and complex canopy structures. This study hypothesized that optimized spectral band combinations focused on the visible spectrum may outperform configurations including near-infrared (NIR) for coffee crop segmentation. This work aimed to evaluate how different spectral band combinations affect the performance of the U-Net for segmenting coffee crops in mountainous regions. Seven PlanetScope images (4 m resolution) from Matas de Minas, Brazil, covering different phenological stages in 2023–2024, were divided into 316 training patches and 25 test patches of 256 × 256 pixels and used to train U-Net models across five spectral band combinations: (B, G, R), (B, G, NIR), (B, R, NIR), (G, R, NIR), and (B, G, R, NIR). The visible spectrum combination (B, G, R) demonstrated superior performance with an overall Accuracy of 0.8669 and, for the Coffee Crops class, an F1-score of 0.8682 and an IoU of 0.7671, outperforming all NIR-inclusive configurations. Visible bands’ sensitivity to pigmentation variations proved more effective in heterogeneous environments, while NIR increased spectral confusion near native vegetation and crop edges. The model overestimated cultivated area by 18.3% due to mixed pixels from 4 m resolution and mountainous terrain. These findings confirm that visible-spectrum bands offer a cost-effective alternative for coffee segmentation, though higher spatial resolution is needed for improved boundary delineation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Leite et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5cd15a333a821460a56fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8040125
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper