PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences0 citations

Architecture Induces Structural Invariant Manifolds of Neural Network Training Dynamics

View Full Paper
JZJiajie ZhaoTLTao LuoYZYaoyu Zhang

Key Points

  • The research aims to clarify how neural network architecture impacts training dynamics through structural invariant manifolds.
  • Developed an analytic framework using geometric control theory
  • Characterized dynamical properties of model parameterization
  • Proved that structural invariant manifolds are unions of orbits of vector field family
  • Analyzed symmetry-induced manifolds in fully-connected neural networks
  • Demonstrated that structural invariant manifolds confine gradient flow trajectories independent of data
  • Established that model symmetry induces structural invariant manifolds
  • Characterized a hierarchy of symmetry-induced manifolds in fully-connected networks
  • Showed that two-layer networks have symmetry-induced structural invariant manifolds

Abstract

While architecture is recognized as key to the performance of deep neural networks, its precise effect on training dynamics has been unclear due to the confounding influence of data and loss functions. This paper proposed an analytic framework based on the geometric control theory to characterize the dynamical properties intrinsic to a model’s parameterization. We prove that the Structural Invariant Manifolds (SIMs) of an analytic model F (θ) (x) —submanifolds that confine gradient flow trajectories independent of data and loss—are unions of orbits of the vector field family ∇ θ F (·) (x) | x ∈ ℝ d. We then prove that a model’s symmetry, e. g. , permutation symmetry for neural networks, induces SIMs. Applying this, we characterize the hierarchy of symmetry-induced SIMs in fully-connected networks, where dynamics exhibit neuron condensation and equivalence to reduced-width networks. For two-layer networks, we prove all SIMs are symmetryinduced, closing the gap between known symmetries and all possible invariants. Overall, by establishing the framework for analyzing SIMs induced by architecture, our work paves the way for a deeper analysis of neural network training dynamics and generalization in the near future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5cd15a333a821460a6a2https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218202526420078
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1From Parameters to Manifolds: Understanding the Limits of Scaling and the Geometry of Learning2025
  2. 2From Parameters to Manifolds: Understanding the Limits of Scaling and the Geometry of Learning2025
  3. 3Resilient Cognitive Architectures via Anosov Flows on Lorentz Manifolds: A Topological Approach to Functional Identity Preservation2026
  4. 4Symmetry-aware learning in machine intelligence: architectural principles and deployment trade-offs2026
  5. 5ResNet and Asymmetric ResNet Weights, for "The Empirical Impact of Neural Parameter Symmetries, or Lack Thereof"2024