PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Kinetics and Catalysis1 citations

Effect of Fe, Co and Mo Additives on Catalytic Activity of a Titania-Supported Zinc Oxide in Propane Dehydrogenation

View Full Paper
VSV. I. SobolevACA. N. ChernovGZG. A. Zenkovets

Key Points

  • The research aims to investigate the impact of various metal additives on the catalytic activity of zinc oxide for propane dehydrogenation.
  • Screening of different metal oxides including Fe, Co, and Mo for catalytic performance in propane dehydrogenation.
  • Characterization of catalysts using nitrogen adsorption, X-ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy.
  • Testing catalytic performance in a fixed-bed flow-type reactor at controlled conditions.
  • Mo was found to significantly enhance short-term catalytic activity.
  • Fe and Co contributed to greater stability of the catalyst over time.
  • The Mo–Zn/TiO2 catalyst achieved up to 29% conversion of propane with 95% selectivity for propylene.

Abstract

Metal oxide catalysts, which can compete with commercial platinum and chromium catalysts for nonoxidative propane dehydrogenation (PDH), are of significant practical and scientific interest. In this study, the catalytic activity of bulk zinc oxide promoted with La, Y, V, Fe, Co, Ni, W, Mo, Cu, Ce, Mn, In and Sn was screened in PDH, and this allowed selection of Fe, Co, and Mo as the most promising additives. Subsequent screening of the catalytic performance of a titania-supported zinc oxide promoted by the selected elements indicated that Mo increased the short-term catalytic activity the most, while Fe and Co provided higher catalyst stability. The catalysts were characterized by low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, X-ray diffraction analysis and transmission electron microscopy. PDH reaction, catalyzed by Mo–Zn/TiO2 at 600°C and tested in fixed-bed flow-type reactor at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 7500 mL h−1 g{₂₀ₓ}^{ - 1} (propane/N2 = 1/10), afforded up to 29% propane conversion with 95% propylene selectivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sobolev et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5dc55a333a821460bc19https://doi.org/10.1134/s0023158425600786
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper