PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Genel Tıp Dergisi0 citationsOpen Access

Radiation Safety at the Time of Patient Discharge in Persons Undergoing Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging

FYFari̇se YılmazTKTayyip Remzi KoruNANeriman Akdam

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the radiation exposure levels in patients discharged after undergoing F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging.
  • Measured dose rates at 0.5 m, 1 m, and 2 m from patients' chests using a survey meter.
  • Collected data from 123 patients who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT scans.
  • Analyzed the correlation between hospital stay duration and radiation dose.
  • Average injected dose was 8.05 mCi of radioactive material.
  • Average radiation dose rates were 11.33 µSv/h at 0.5 m, 5.7 µSv/h at 1 m, and 2.3 µSv/h at 2 m.
  • Significant negative correlation found between hospital stay duration and radiation dose rates at all distances.

Abstract

Aim: F-18 FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose) PET/CT is an imaging method increasingly used in nuclear medicine due to the rising incidence of cancer in society. Additionally, since this imaging is performed with higher photon energy, it significantly increases anxiety among hospital staff. In our study, we aimed to measure the radiation dose rate ratio released to the environment and evaluate environmental radiation exposure in patients who underwent PET/CT with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) at the time of discharge.Materials and Methods: Dose rates at 0.5 meters (m), 1 m, and 2 m from the anterior chest of 123 patients (M/F: 69/54) who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging in the Department of Nuclear Medicine PET/CT were measured using a survey meter.Findings: Patients received an average of 8.05 mCi (millicurie) of radioactive material and waited in the clinic for 78.34 minutes. Following the imaging, the average radiation dose rates at 0.5 m, 1 m, and 2 m were found to be 11.33 ± 2.67, 5.7 ± 1.3, and 2.3 ± 5 µSv/h, respectively (Tables 1, 2, 3) (Figure 1). There was a statistically significant (p 0.0001) negative correlation between the duration of hospital stay after F-18 FDG injection and the F-18 FDG dose injected into the patient and the dose rates measured at all three distances. (Table 4, 5) (Figure 1).Conclusion: Our study showed that the F-18 FDG PET/CT scans done in the Nuclear Medicine Department were for diagnostic purposes. This means that, according to international and national radiation safety rules, the department is exposed to low doses and does not pose a threat to the environmental radiation safety. Additionally, the staff member or caregiver receives a significantly lower dose as they are farther from the patient.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yılmaz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5dc55a333a821460bc25https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1729733
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper