PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026AI in Civil Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Prediction of damage signals at inaccessible locations using a machine learning approach

ASAnoop SharmaNSNeetika SahaPTPijush Topdar

Key Points

  • To generate synthetic experimental signals at inaccessible structural locations using machine learning techniques.
  • Utilized a machine learning approach with an artificial neural network (ANN) to generate synthetic signals.
  • Synthesized experimental signals from numerically simulated acoustic emission (AE) signals.
  • Determined relevant parameters using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC).
  • Achieved an accuracy of approximately 99% in predicting damage signals.
  • Successfully generated synthetic signals for inaccessible locations where direct testing is impractical.

Abstract

Structures are prone to damage. Identification and localization of damage at its initiation stage are extremely helpful for ensuring safety, economy, and operational benefits. A machine learning (ML) approach is helpful for this purpose, provided that high-quality and sufficient damage signals are available from a variety of locations across the structure. Such signals, generated at damage initiation, are frequently obtained using a non-destructive testing (NDT) technique, such as acoustic emission (AE), which employs the pencil lead break (PLB) method. However, PLB is not possible at inaccessible locations of the structure. Therefore, synthetic experimental signals are required for such locations. Accordingly, the present study aims to generate synthetic experimental signals from numerically simulated AE signals using an artificial neural network (ANN). Here, parameters from numerical signals serve as inputs, and the corresponding parameters of experimental signals are outputs. The most relevant signal parameters are determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). The developed model is found to perform very well, achieving an accuracy of around 99%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5dc55a333a821460bc34https://doi.org/10.1007/s43503-026-00090-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper