PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Journal of Medical Physics0 citationsOpen Access

Automated Method for Evaluation of Z-axis Laser Alignment Accuracy using the Siemens Computed Tomography Phantom

View Full Paper
ESEka SaputraCAChoirul AnamPTPandji Triadyaksa

Key Points

  • The study aims to create an automated system for accurately measuring z-axis laser alignment in computed tomography using a Siemens CT phantom.
  • Developed an automated method for measuring z-axis laser alignment using a Siemens CT phantom.
  • Segmented images of the phantom and measured its radius.
  • Profile of pixel values was analyzed to measure distances between notches.
  • Evaluated for various set distances ranging from 0 to 9 mm and slice thicknesses from 0.6 to 5 mm.
  • Compared results of automated measurements to manual measurements.
  • The correlation coefficient between automated and set distance measures is above 0.99.
  • Automated measurements were slightly lower than manual ones.
  • Average differences between automated and manual results ranged from 0.14 mm to 0.26 mm.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to develop an automated system for measuring z-axis laser alignment in computed tomography (CT) using a Siemens CT phantom. Methods: The automatic method for measuring z-axis laser alignment involves many steps . The image of the second module of the Siemens CT phantom was segmented. The radius of the phantom image was measured. The profile of pixel value along the two engraved notches was made at the 97% of phantom’s radius. The distance between two peaks of the pixel value profile, indicating the distance between two engraved notches, was measured. The distance was then converted from pixel units to millimeter units. This distance indicated the z-axis displacement ( d ). The automated method was evaluated for various set distances ( d ) ranging from 0 to 9 mm and for different slice thicknesses from 0.6 to 5 mm. The results of automated d measurements were compared to the manual d measurements. Results: The coefficient of correlation ( R ) between automated and set d are above 0.99. Measured d values with the automatic method are slightly lower compared to those from the manual method. The average differences between automatic and manual d results range from 0.14 mm to 0.26 mm across various nominal slice thicknesses. Conclusions: The developed software for automated z-axis laser alignment offers reliable, objective, and accurate results. This approach has the potential to help medical practitioners perform quality control of z-axis laser alignment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saputra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5dc55a333a821460bc3bhttps://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_176_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvement in z-axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped conventional CT scans.1995 · 51 citations
  2. 2Deep learning enabled ultra‐fast‐pitch acquisition in clinical X‐ray computed tomography2021 · 9 citations
  3. 3CT Scan Parameters and Radiation Dose: Practical Advice for Radiologists2013 · 161 citations
  4. 4How I Do It: Managing Radiation Dose in CT2014 · 196 citations
  5. 5Toward standardized quantitative image quality (IQ) assessment in computed tomography (CT): A comprehensive framework for automated and comparative IQ analysis based on ICRU Report 872015 · 30 citations