PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Business Strategy and the Environment0 citationsOpen Access

What Constitutes an Attractive Product‐as‐a‐Service Offer? Examining Consumer Preferences for (Circular) Business Patterns

View Full Paper
SSSteven SarasiniADAemiro Melkamu DanielKWKatherine Whalen

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore consumer preferences for product-as-a-service offers with circular attributes across different regions.
  • Conducted choice experiments focusing on robotic vacuum cleaners, lawnmowers, strollers, and wool coats.
  • Compared consumer preferences for access versus ownership and product conditions like new, refurbished, and used.
  • Analyzed preferences between Swedish and Dutch consumers regarding monthly payment models and ownership.
  • Swedish consumers prefer pay-monthly models, while Dutch consumers tend to favor ownership.
  • Preferences lean towards new products over refurbished or used ones; however, aesthetics and functionality can sway opinions.
  • Discussion highlights the pros and cons of choice experiments in understanding circular business models.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Little is known about consumer preferences for combinations of circular business model patterns, despite their potential to benefit the design of product services. This study examines consumer preferences for product‐as‐a‐service offers, combined with circular product attributes, across Sweden and the Netherlands. Using choice experiments for robotic vacuum cleaners, robotic lawnmowers, strollers and wool coats, we investigate access versus ownership, product condition, repair options and other aspects of product circularity. Results reveal that Swedish consumers show stronger preferences for pay‐monthly models, while Dutch consumers favour ownership. Preferences for new over refurbished or used products dominate, though product appearance and functionality can mitigate concerns. The study discusses the advantages and limitations of choice experiments and advocates a mixed method approach within user‐centric design to identify successful combinations of circular business model patterns that can potentially deliver resource efficiency benefits.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sarasini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5de95a333a821460bef5https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70800
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Performance Economy: Business Models for the Functional Service Economy2008 · 44 citations
  2. 2BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATIONS FOR ELECTRIC MOBILITY — WHAT CAN BE LEARNED FROM EXISTING BUSINESS MODEL PATTERNS?2013 · 288 citations
  3. 3Designing and conducting stated choice experiments2024 · 56 citations
  4. 4Car-sharing vs bike-sharing: A choice experiment to understand young people behaviour2020 · 19 citations
  5. 5Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing: Table 1.2012 · 1,986 citations