PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Comparative CFD Study of Heat Transfer Characteristics in Top and Bottom Jet Impingement Cooling

View Full Paper
OOObinna Michael OnohJOJoseph Chinedu OkaforCOChisom Benedicta Onyekachi

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the heat transfer characteristics of top and bottom jet impingement cooling methods using CFD analysis and experimental validation.
  • Used rectangular steel plates for experiments measuring 230mm by 120mm by 12mm.
  • Conducted experiments with jet diameters of 10mm and 40mm.
  • Applied impingement gaps of 115mm and 155mm in cooling tests.
  • Analyzed heat transfer using lumped thermal mass analysis model and validated results with ANSYS CFD.
  • Top surface cooling showed a 63% efficiency difference at a 10mm diameter and 115mm gap.
  • At a 40mm diameter and 155mm gap, the top surface maintained a 66% cooling efficiency.
  • Maximum heat fluxes measured were 22518W/m2 for the top surface at 10mm and 6742.8W/m2 at 40mm.
  • Validation indicated a low error margin of 0.2s/°C for the top surface.

Abstract

Jet impingement heat transfer was studied using top and bottom surface stationary cooling configuration. Using rectangular steel plates of 230mm by 120mm by 12mm, and single jet diameters of 10mm and 40mm with impingement gaps of 115mm and 155mm. Experimental data were reduced by lumped thermal mass analysis model for calculating convective heat transfer coefficient and ANSYS CFD software was used to validate experimental results. The results analyzed by lumped thermal mass analytical showed that, for a diameter 10mm and impingement gap of 115mm, the Top surface showed bettercontrolled cooling with a 63% difference, and at impingement gap, 155mm top surface maintained better cooling with a 66% difference for a diameter 40mm. The calculated convective heat transfer coefficient increases with an increase in pipe diameter and a corresponding increase in impingement gaps in both cooling processes. The CFD results revealed maximum heat fluxes of 22518W/m2 and 6742.8w/m2 for the top at 10mm and 40mm diameters. This proved top surface cooling configuration is better than the bottom with maximum heat flux. The validation showed an acceptable error margin for both surfaces with a diameter of 10mm 0.2s/0C for the top surface.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Onoh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5de95a333a821460bf25https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19352560
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Study on Heat Transfer Characteristics of Jet Impingement of Turbine Bending Surface2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Heat Transfer in a Tall Coupled Impingement–Effusion Cooling System2026
  3. 3Flow and heat transfer analysis on impingement/effusion cooling configuration including jet orifices with conformal pins2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Experimental Heat Transfer and Cooling Effectiveness over an Effusion Wall with Internal Jet-Array Impingement: Influence of Hole Arrangement2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5CFD Analysis of Heat Transfer Enhancement Due to Vectored Annular Jet Impingement2026