PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Authority Confidence Rating (ACR): A Cryptographic Standard for Real-Time AI Decision Authorization Verification and AI Liability Quantification

View Full Paper
IMIlyes Tarik Mazari

Key Points

  • The aim is to establish a standardized framework for quantifying and verifying AI decision-making authorization in real time.
  • Introduced a base formula for calculating ACR based on verifiable human authorization.
  • Defined four certification tiers for AI decision processes.
  • Identified three application domains: insurance, regulatory compliance, and defense operations.
  • Relied on cryptographic enforcement data instead of traditional data collection methods.
  • Established ACR as a measurable standard for AI decision authorization.
  • Developed ACR variants highlighting different authorization risks and characteristics.
  • Outlined specific cases where unauthorized execution is structurally prevented with ACR-Zero.

Abstract

This paper introduces the Authority Confidence Rating (ACR), a cryptographic standard for quantifying AI decision authorization in real time. ACR measures the proportion of AI-influenced decisions that carried verifiable, cryptographically signed human authorization before execution. The standard defines a base formula (ACR = (V/D) × 100), a risk-weighted variant (ACR-W), four certification tiers (Platinum, Gold, Silver, Unrated), and a separate ACR-Zero designation for architectures where unauthorized execution is structurally impossible. Three application domains are identified: insurance underwriting, regulatory compliance under the EU AI Act and Product Liability Directive 2024/2853, and defense operations including real-time mission authorization monitoring. ACR is derived from cryptographic enforcement data, not from logs, surveys, or self-assessments. The framework is published under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Implementation of ACR computation using cryptographic authority enforcement may require licensing from YIN Technologies. This paper constitutes the first version of the ACR standard. An extended version introducing the Authority Confidence Deficit (ACD) and AI Liability Quantification (ALQ) constructs is published as a companion record. Implementation using cryptographic authority enforcement require licensing from the inventor. Licensing inquiries: ilyesmazari@hotmail.com

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ilyes Tarik Mazari (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e015a333a821460c0dahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19361421
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Authority Confidence Rating (ACR) and Authority Confidence Deficit (ACD): A Cryptographic Standard for Real-Time AI Decision Authorization Verification and AI Liability Quantification2026
  2. 2Agent Control Protocol: Admission Control for Agent Actions2026
  3. 3Agent Control Protocol (ACP) v1.17 — Admission Control for Agent Actions2026
  4. 4ARC-S: Architectural Authority Control for Intelligent Systems Constraining Assertion, Decision, and Action Beyond Capability Scaling2026
  5. 5From Standards to Proof: The YIN-AI Governance Architecture, the QCR Quantum Certification Standard, and the Operational Response to Quantum Technology Governance2026