PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Journal of Engineering Thermophysics0 citations

On the Hall–Vinen–Bekharevich–Khalatnikov Model in Superfluid Turbulence in He II

View Full Paper
SNS. K. Nemirovskii

Key Points

  • The analysis assesses the effectiveness of the HVBK model in explaining superfluid turbulence dynamics.
  • Critical evaluation of the HVBK method for superfluid flows.
  • Incorporation of mutual friction effects between velocities.
  • Examination of vortex bundle structures and their implications.
  • The HVBK model inadequately describes the vortex tangle structure.
  • Vortex bundles did not provide useful insights into quantum turbulence.
  • The analysis indicates that HVBK may hinder the development of a proper theoretical framework.

Abstract

A critical analysis of the use of the HVBK method to study three-dimensional, turbulent flows of superfluids is presented. The formalism incorporates mutual friction between the normal and superfluidity velocities due to quantum vortexes. The approach relies on the HVBK model, originally developed for He II rotation. It relates vortex line density to coarse-grain vorticity, using the well-known Feynman’s rule. Various justifications and results associated with the method are analyzed. Particular emphasis is placed on the so-called “vortex bundle” structure. The concept of vortex bundles forming quantum turbulence structure is controversial, and does not support the use of HVBK. The final conclusion is that HVBK seems highly counterproductive because it completely disregards the actual structure of vortex tangle as a chaotic cluster of vortex loops and prevents development of adequate theory.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

S. K. Nemirovskii (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e2e5a333a821460c4f3https://doi.org/10.1134/s1810232825700250
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper