PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS OF CHINA0 citations

Short Selling and Corporate Tax Avoidance: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Market Supervision Effect

ZXZhang Xinyue

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to explore how short selling affects corporate tax avoidance behaviors.
  • Utilized a quasi-natural experiment involving margin trading and short selling.
  • Employed a staggered difference-in-differences approach.
  • Conducted heterogeneity analysis based on enterprise scale, industry competition, and media supervision.
  • Verified conclusions using parallel trend and placebo tests.
  • Short selling significantly reduces corporate tax avoidance behaviors, confirmed at the 1% level.
  • Inhibitory effects are stronger in larger firms and those facing industry competition.
  • Media supervision enhances the effectiveness of short selling on reducing tax avoidance.

Abstract

Against the background of the increasing concealment of corporate tax avoidance behaviors, the market supervision value of the short selling mechanism has become increasingly prominent. Using Chinese A-share listed firms during 2016–2024 as the research sample, this paper leverages the quasi-natural experiment of phased expansion of margin trading and short selling. To start with, the staggered difference-in-differences approach is adopted to systematically explore the impact of short selling on corporate tax avoidance behaviors. The core explanatory variable "treat" is significantly negative at the 1% level, and the inhibitory effect remains robust after adding control variables, confirming that short selling can effectively constrain corporate tax avoidance behaviors; Secondly, heterogeneity analysis is carried out from three dimensions: enterprise scale, industry competition, and media supervision. It is found that the interaction terms between the three and short selling are all significantly negative at the 1% level, indicating that the inhibitory effect is more prominent in large enterprises and enterprises with strong industry competition, and media supervision can strengthen this effect; Thirdly, the reliability of the conclusions is verified through parallel trend test and placebo test, excluding potential interferences such as time trends and model settings; Finally, after considering other explanations, the research conclusions still hold.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang Xinyue (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5ebd5a333a821460d586https://doi.org/10.47297/wspdecwsp2515-797317.20250912
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multiple Large Shareholders, Investment Efficiency and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from China2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Are Short Sellers Informed Traders?: Focus on the Impact of Tax Avoidance Information on Short Selling2024
  3. 3Firms' Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Tax Avoidance: Evidence From China2025
  4. 4The Sustainable Value of Market Discipline: How Short‐Selling Enhances Corporate ESG Performance2026
  5. 5The effect of tax avoidance on earnings persistence: evidence from China2024 · 1 citations