Heat stress is one of the main factors limiting the efficiency and sustainability of dairy production in tropical and subtropical regions, impairing animal welfare, as well as productive and reproductive performance. Among mitigation technologies, evaporative cooling stands out as a widely adopted strategy in intensive production systems. However, there are still no consolidated metrics capable of quantifying, in a comparative and regionalized manner, the theoretical potential for using this technique under different climatic conditions. In this context, the objective of this study was to develop an innovative modeling-based metric to estimate the potential for evaporative cooling based on thermal environment indices and heat transfer principles. Sixteen-year time series of hourly meteorological data from three Brazilian municipalities located in major dairy-producing regions Uberlândia (MG), Luziânia (GO), and Uruguaiana (RS), encompassing representative tropical and subtropical conditions, were used to calculate the Temperature–Humidity Index (THI) and to develop the metric termed Radiant Heat Load Reduction under Evaporative Cooling (ΔRHL). Based on the results obtained, THI values were found to frequently exceed the thermal comfort thresholds between September and April, corresponding to the warmest period of the year in Brazil. However, the relationship between the intensity of heat stress and the theoretical potential for evaporative cooling varied significantly among the locations, indicating that the potential efficiency of evaporative cooling is strongly dependent on regional climatic conditions and is more consistent in subtropical environments. It is concluded that the proposed metric constitutes an innovative tool for the spatial and temporal quantification of the potential efficiency of evaporative cooling, with applicability in decision support and in the planning of thermal mitigation strategies in intensive dairy production systems.
Mariano et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: