PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Longitudinal Human–AI Interaction: From Interaction Signatures to Regime Dynamics Toward a Mechanistic Model of Formation, Stability, and Breakdown in Signature-Induced Behavioral Regimes

View Full Paper
JHJustin HudsonCHChase Hudson

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a mechanistic model that elaborates on the formation, stability, and breakdown of behavioral regimes in human-AI interactions.
  • Introduced a dynamical model for interaction regimes as attractor-like regions in output space.
  • Analyzed how early interaction shapes model’s stability through boundary conditions.
  • Investigated the role of constraint-consistent interaction in maintaining coherence across exchanges.
  • Identified the mechanisms of regime formation and breakdown based on interaction patterns.
  • Demonstrated that regime stability can persist without memory in repeated engagements.
  • Outlined predictions for regime activation speed and sensitivity to interaction variations.

Abstract

Recent work on Signature-Induced Behavioral Regimes (SIBR) demonstrates that recurring patterns in human–AI interaction, including reasoning structure, abstraction level, and linguistic style, can induce stable configurations of behavior within large language models (Hudson Hudson Hudson & Hudson, 2025c), this framework unifies previously observed phenomena, including continuity without memory, interaction signature detection, and stability under repeated engagement, into a single mechanistic account. The model generates testable predictions regarding regime activation speed, persistence under variation, and sensitivity to perturbation, and provides a foundation for externally applied control of model behavior without modification to underlying parameters. By shifting the focus from prompt-level effects to interaction-level dynamics, this work extends the SIBR framework from a descriptive account to a mechanistic theory of regime dynamics, offering a complementary pathway to stability and alignment grounded in structured, constraint-consistent engagement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hudson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5f225a333a821460e09bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19359529
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper