PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation1 citationsOpen Access

Limitations of Cluster-Trained MLIPs for Liquid Density and Diffusivity

View Full Paper
VSViktor SvahnIMIoan-Bogdan MagdăuSNSamuel P. Niblett

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the uncertainties in machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) for liquid density and diffusivity.
  • Trained MLIPs using MACE architecture based on two data sets: periodic structures and molecular clusters
  • Assessed the impact of training set size and random seeds on the model outputs
  • Simulated liquid properties using molecular dynamics (MD) for ethylene carbonate and ethyl methyl carbonate
  • All MACE-MLIPs produced stable molecular dynamics trajectories of 1 ns under NPT conditions
  • Cluster-trained MLIPs showed significant sensitivity to random training seeds and data selection
  • Large uncertainties were observed in simulated diffusivity and density values from cluster-trained MLIPs

Abstract

Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) based on quantum-mechanical data are often used as a means to combine the performance of classical force-fields with the accuracy of electronic structure methods. In this work, MLIPs based on the MACE architecture were trained, starting from two publicly available data sets: one based on periodic structures, and the other based on molecular cluster data. Two rather challenging liquid properties are in focus, density and diffusivity, here for the battery-relevant ethylene carbonate and ethyl methyl carbonate solvents and mixtures thereof. The focus of our study is the uncertainties in the generated MLIP models themselves (calculated for committees of models with different regression seeds and different training set sizes) and how these uncertainties reflect on the MD-simulated target properties. The second focus point is whether these uncertainties are small enough to allow the comparison and assessment of different density functional theory (DFT) functionals; here, only a small number of them are compared, but the workflow opens up for a more extensive assessment of many DFT functionals. We find that all our MACE-MLIPs, both cluster-trained ones and the periodic-structure-trained ones, produce stable 1 ns NPT trajectories, regardless of training set size and cluster composition, but the MACE-MLIPs trained on cluster data (labeled with the hybrid ωB97X-D3 functional) are found to be sensitive to both the random training seed and the data selection, resulting in large uncertainties on the simulated diffusivity and density values.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Svahn et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5f645a333a821460e7dfhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c02043
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantum process tomography of structured optical gates with convolutional neural networks2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Transferability and Accuracy of Ionic Liquid Simulations with Equivariant Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials2024 · 33 citations
  3. 3Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy2005 · 30,950 citations
  4. 4Generic Solvents2014 · 2 citations
  5. 5Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries2004 · 7,384 citations