PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology1 citations

Always a good thing? The resource perspective to understand the double‐edged sword effect of empowering leadership on employee expediency

View Full Paper
JXJie XiaoBLBo LvYZYinxu Zhou

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the dual impact of empowering leadership on employee expediency depending on task complexity.
  • Conducted a two-wave field study with 236 participants.
  • Performed two pre-registered scenario-based experiments with 213 and 230 participants respectively.
  • Analyzed the relationship between empowering leadership, task complexity, and emotional exhaustion.
  • Empowering leadership increases employee expediency under high task complexity due to higher emotional exhaustion.
  • It decreases employee expediency under low task complexity due to lower emotional exhaustion.
  • Findings were consistent across field study and experiments.

Abstract

Abstract Prior studies have documented the positive effects of empowering leadership on task efficiency. However, this research stream has largely overlooked that employees might promote task efficiency through potentially unethical means. Given that expediency represents a covert, less morally intense, yet prevalent form of unethical behaviour for task efficiency, we introduce a novel resource‐based perspective to explore when and how empowering leadership positively or negatively influences employee expediency. Drawing upon the conservation of resources theory, we contend that empowering leadership is positively related to employee expediency via increased emotional exhaustion when task complexity is higher, but it also reduces expediency via decreased emotional exhaustion when task complexity is lower. Results from a two‐wave field study ( N = 236) and two pre‐registered scenario‐based experiments ( N s = 213, 230) consistently supported our hypotheses. We contribute to the literature on empowering leadership, employee expediency and work design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5fe05a333a821460e9dbhttps://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations1970 · 5,301 citations
  2. 2BEYOND SELF-MANAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF TEAM EMPOWERMENT.1999 · 1,837 citations
  3. 3A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts2007 · 2,494 citations
  4. 4Some Common Myths About Centering Predictor Variables in Moderated Multiple Regression and Polynomial Regression2011 · 475 citations
  5. 5My Coworkers are Treated More Fairly than Me! A Self-Regulatory Perspective on Justice Social Comparisons2019 · 115 citations