PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology0 citations

Rapid automatised naming and alternating stimulus including letters and numbers: an exploratory comparative eye-tracking study in a sample of university students with and without learning disabilities

View Full Paper
GAGeorgia AndreouGCGaryfalia CharitakiMGMaria Gkantaki

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore attentional and processing challenges faced by university students with learning disabilities (LD) compared to those without.
  • Conducted an eye-tracking study with university students
  • Compared rapid automatised naming using letters and numbers
  • Examined processing differences between students with and without learning disabilities
  • Identified subtle processing differences in students with learning disabilities
  • Demonstrated the effectiveness of eye-tracking in revealing attentional challenges

Abstract

Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the attentional and processing challenges faced by students with LD and highlight the value of eye-tracking for identifying subtle processing differences that traditional assessments may overlook. Implications for early identification, intervention design, and future research are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andreou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5fe05a333a821460ea14https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2026.2645905
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper