PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Coatings1 citationsOpen Access

Surface Modification and Coating for Titanium Dental Implants: A Review on Advances in Techniques, Biological Performance, and Clinical Applications

View Full Paper
ABAmantle BalangGBGordon BlunnMRMarta Roldo

Key Points

  • The aim is to review advancements in surface modification techniques for titanium dental implants and their biological impact.
  • Reviewed conventional, advanced, and hybrid surface modification techniques.
  • Analyzed effects of subtractive methods and combined treatments on implant characteristics.
  • Evaluated coating methods for antimicrobial properties and osteogenic differentiation.
  • Discussed hybrid techniques for controlled topography and chemical properties.
  • Subtractive methods increase microroughness but may promote bacterial adhesion.
  • Combined treatments enhance osteoblast proliferation and clinical implant stability.
  • Coatings provide high antimicrobial activity against bacteria and improve osteogenic differentiation.
  • Hybrid techniques promote early bone-to-implant contact, significantly improving integration rates.

Abstract

Dental implants have become common for restoring function and aesthetics after edentulism, with titanium (Ti) remaining the most widely used material due to its excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Despite their clinical success, long-term performance is strongly influenced by surface characteristics, which regulate osseointegration and susceptibility to bacterial colonisation. Consequently, surface modification approaches have become critical strategies to enhance implant stability, bioactivity and longevity. This review critically evaluates conventional, advanced, and hybrid surface modification strategies. Subtractive methods, such as sandblasting and acid etching, increase microroughness (Ra 1.5–3 μm), enhancing osteoblast attachment and differentiation, but may promote bacterial adhesion and surface contamination. Combined treatments like SLA and SLActive generate hierarchical micro–nano topographies, improving protein adsorption, early-stage osteoblast proliferation (up to 2-fold), and clinical stability. Laser ablation and photofunctionalisation further modulate surface chemistry and wettability, accelerating osseointegration and epithelial cell adhesion. Coating approaches, including layer-by-layer self-assembly, nanospray drying, plasma spraying, and piezoelectric nanocomposites, introduce antimicrobial activity (>95% reduction in Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus) and enhanced osteogenic differentiation with mechanical stability, with adhesion values reaching 49 MPa. Hybrid techniques such as sol–gel, hydrothermal, and anodisation provide controlled topography, chemical composition, and bioactivity, promoting early bone-to-implant contact (BIC increase of 10%–25%) in preclinical models. Notwithstanding promising in vitro and in vivo outcomes, variability in processing parameters and limited standardisation restrict large-scale clinical translation. Overall, contemporary Ti surface engineering emphasises a synergistic balance of topography, chemistry, wettability, and hierarchical structuring to optimise biological performance for dental implant applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Balang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5fe05a333a821460eb0dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16040423
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper