The Circulatory Model of Physics derives physical predictions from five integer axioms (N=3, DB=8, DM=6, DT=8, D=22) with zero free parameters. This paper subjects the framework to three independent falsification tests against the numerology hypothesis: (1) an exhaustive constraint analysis proving the axiom set is uniquely determined, (2) a Monte Carlo joint precision test against 100, 000 random integer theories yielding p = 9. 0e-5, and (3) an information-theoretic analysis showing 8. 2x compression of physical information. The fine structure constant prediction alone (0. 0015% error, p = 5. 0e-6) independently rejects the null hypothesis. Six falsifiability criteria are identified for future experimental scrutiny.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brehnan Jones
ResearchWorks (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brehnan Jones (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0af68659487ece0fa554e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19381121