Financial news sentiment influences investor decisions, but most research focuses on market-level outcomes rather than how individual investors with different personalities interpret the same news. We combined a Random Forest sentiment classifier (80.2% accuracy on FinancialPhraseBank) with a multi-agent simulation using FinBERT on 2,263 expert-labeled headlines, producing 226,300 decisions across 100 agents with randomized perception, portfolio memory, and herding dynamics. The clearest result was about neutral headlines: agents agreed on only 89.4% of neutral headlines compared to 98-99% for positive and negative, which mirrors the classifier's 26% neutral error rate. Herding cascades appeared in 32.8% (buy) and 16.0% (sell) of headlines, but ablation tests showed cascades barely changed when the herding mechanism was turned off, meaning agents were independently reaching the same conclusion rather than copying each other. A small shift toward caution appeared but was too small to be meaningful. Overall, neutral sentiment appears to be where both classification and investor agreement break down.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yuvaansh Kapila
Jaitra Bhatt
John Akinyemi
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kapila et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0afde659487ece0fa5fdb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19392605