PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Addressing non-stationarity with stochastic trend in the context of limited time series data: An experimental survey in healthcare analytics

View Full Paper
ABApollinaire Batoure BamanaYLYannick Sokdou bila lamouDFDavid Jaurès Fotsa-Mbogne

Key Points

  • The aim is to address stochastic non-stationarity in time series data and improve forecasting methods in healthcare analytics.
  • Utilized 24 series of malaria and typhoid incidence from Cameroon.
  • Tested four forecasting models: ARIMA, ARFIMA, LSTM, and FD-LSTM.
  • Assessed model accuracy using RMSE, MAE, and R² values.
  • Pearson correlation coefficients between integer-differentiated series are weak, between 0.2 and 0.4.
  • Correlations for fractional-differentiated series range from 0.75 to 0.98.
  • ARFIMA outperformed ARIMA by 93% in training and 100% in testing.
  • FD-LSTM achieved a 100% improvement over the LSTM model.

Abstract

Stationarity is a fundamental assumption in time series modeling that underlies reliable statistical inference and forecasting. Time series data can be found in many domains, including industry, engineering, finance, economics, epidemiology, and health care analysis. This study addresses stochastic non-stationarity arising from unit root processes. It explores the efficacy of fractional differentiation as a means of achieving stationarity, especially in the context of limited-sample time series data, and attempts to confirm it statistically through experiments. To this end, 24 series of malaria and typhoid incidence were used, from the Adamawa region of Cameroon, collected weekly from January 2021 to December 2023, 14 of which were non-stationary. Four models were tested: Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Fractional ARIMA (ARFIMA), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and a hybrid Fractionally-Differentiated-LSTM (FD-LSTM) proposed in this paper. The accuracy of the prediction models was assessed by the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Coefficient of Determination (R²) values. The results show that the Pearson correlations between the original time series and the integer-differentiated series are weak, mainly between 0.2 and 0.4, while they are between 0.75 and 0.98 for the fractional-differentiated series. Moreover, ARFIMA outperforms ARIMA by 93% in training and 100% in testing, while FD-LSTM achieves a 100% improvement over the standard LSTM model. These results contribute to the methodological toolkit for time series forecasting in data analytics and highlight the statistical and practical advantages of fractional differencing in small sample preprocessing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bamana et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fba0a79560c99a0a1b2fhttps://doi.org/10.35784/acs_7862
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prévision ARFIMA des taux de change: Les modélisateurs doivent-ils encore exhorter à la naïveté des prévisions?1999 · 6 citations
  2. 2Ten Applications of Financial Machine Learning2019 · 69 citations
  3. 3Time series forecasting of COVID-19 transmission in Canada using LSTM networks2020 · 1,112 citations
  4. 4Fractional-Differential Models of the Time Series Evolution of Socio-Dynamic Processes with Possible Self-Organization and Memory2024 · 9 citations
  5. 5Time Series Analysis of Dengue Fever Cases in Thailand Utilizing the SARIMA Model2019 · 5 citations