PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026JHLT Open0 citationsOpen Access

Performance of BILateral BronchoAlveolar Lavage During Routine Transplant Surveillance Bronchoscopy Changes Management

AKAmanda KamarIGIrene Riestra GuianceCKChristopher M. Kapp

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess how frequently bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage impacts medical management during lung transplant monitoring.
  • Single center, retrospective cohort study
  • Enrolled 237 lung transplant patients
  • Conducted 759 surveillance bronchoscopies with bilateral BALs from 2020-2025
  • Collected data on demographic factors, cultured pathogens, and biopsy pathology
  • 83 bilateral BALs (10.9%) identified differing pathogens
  • 43 discordant findings (5.7% of procedures) led to management changes
  • All management changes involved adjustments to antimicrobial therapy, with some affecting immunosuppression
  • Common pathogens causing changes included Pseudomonas aeruginosa (32.6%) and Aspergillus species (27.9%)

Abstract

Introduction: Surveillance bronchoscopy for lung transplant monitoring is a standard of care at most high-volume transplant centers, though methods vary based on institutional preferences.At our medical center, we perform bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and unilateral transbronchial biopsy.This study aims to determine how often bilateral BALs lead to a change in medical management.Methods: This is a single center, retrospective cohort study enrolling 237 patients who underwent either bilateral or single lung transplant and who underwent 759 surveillance bronchoscopies with bilateral BALs from 2020-2025.Data collected included demographic data, cultured pathogens bilaterally, and pathology from unilateral biopsies.Different pathogens (DP) were defined by having two positive contralateral results with differing infectious agents, or a J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f positive result in one lung with a negative result in the contralateral lung.Change in management was defined as either alteration of antibiotic coverage or immunosuppressive drug.Results: 83 bilateral BALs (10.9%) identified DP.Of these, 43 discordant findings (5.7% of all procedures) resulted in a change in management.All 43 of these changes involved initiation or adjustment of anti-microbial therapy, and 3 (7.0%)involved an adjustment in immunosuppression.Common pathogens that prompted management changes were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14/43 32.6%) and Aspergillus species (12/43 27.9%).Conclusions: Bilateral BALs identifies clinically significant DPs in over 1 in 10 surveillance procedures, with more than half of these findings directly altering patient care.Because the most common DP identified-Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus species-are strongly associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the results support the practice of performance of bilateral BAL for post-lung transplant surveillance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kamar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fc28a79560c99a0a1cc3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlto.2026.100548
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper