PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

Long-Term Outcomes following Instability After Isolated Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for On-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions With <20% Glenoid Bone Loss

View Full Paper
SDSahil DadooTWTyler C. WilliamsRLR. Jun Lin

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate long-term outcomes and patient-reported outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions and limited glenoid bone loss.
  • Retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated Bankart repair from 2007 to 2018.
  • Excluded patients included those with age <14 or >40 years, >20% glenoid bone loss, and off-track Hill-Sachs lesions.
  • Collected minimum 7-year outcomes on recurrent shoulder instability and patient-reported measures such as WOSI and pVAS.
  • Performed statistical comparisons of variables related to recurrent instability and surgical revisions.
  • 31% of patients experienced at least one recurrent shoulder instability event.
  • 15% underwent revision stabilization surgery at a mean follow-up of 10.4 years.
  • Younger age and participation in collision athletics were linked to higher instability rates.
  • Each 1% increase in glenoid bone loss associated with a 19% increase in odds for revision surgery.
  • 67% achieved acceptable outcomes according to the WOSI scale and 55% for the pVAS.

Abstract

Background: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability rates are high after isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR), especially among patients with off-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) and significant glenoid bone loss. However, there are limited data on long-term recurrent anterior shoulder instability rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following isolated ABR among patients with on-track HSLs and 40 years, glenoid bone loss >20%, off-track HSL, concomitant remplissage, and revision procedures. All patients were contacted to obtain minimum 7-year clinical outcomes, including recurrent anterior shoulder instability and revision stabilization surgery, as well as PRO measures including Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI), pain visual analog scale (pVAS), and Subjective Shoulder Value scores. Variables were compared between recurrent anterior shoulder instability and revision stabilization surgery groups. Significance was set to P < .05. Results: Long-term outcomes were obtained from 55 patients (mean age, 22 years; 32% of all eligible patients) at a mean follow-up of 10.4 years. Seventeen (31%) patients sustained ≥1 recurrent anterior shoulder instability event, and 8 (15%) patients underwent revision stabilization surgery. Younger age ( P = .002) and collision athletics ( P = .02) were associated with sustaining recurrent anterior shoulder instability, whereas distance to dislocation was not associated with recurrent anterior shoulder instability ( P = .59). However, near-track HSLs ( P = .02) and increased glenoid bone loss ( P = .007) were associated with undergoing revision stabilization surgery. For every 1% increase in glenoid bone loss, there were 19% higher odds of undergoing revision stabilization surgery ( P = .02). With regard to PROs, 67% of patients achieved the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for WOSI and 55% of patients achieved the PASS for pVAS. Patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability were less likely than those without recurrent instability to achieve the PASS for both WOSI (24% vs 87%; P < .001) and pVAS (29% vs 66%; P = .01). Conclusion: Rates of recurrent anterior shoulder instability were high following isolated ABR for on-track HSLs with <20% glenoid bone loss and were associated with inferior PROs at mean 10-year follow-up. Younger age and collision athletics were associated with sustaining recurrent anterior shoulder instability, while increased glenoid bone loss was an independent predictor of undergoing revision stabilization surgery. There remains a clinical need for improved stratification of on-track HSLs to identify patients who may benefit from additional procedures to improve recurrent anterior shoulder instability rates and subjective outcomes at long-term follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dadoo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fc8ea79560c99a0a21a8https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261430742
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The glenoid track concept is insufficient to predict Bankart failures: a computed tomography scan study2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Results of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior-Inferior Shoulder Instability at 13-Year Follow-up2016 · 193 citations
  3. 3The Development and Evaluation of a Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Tool for Shoulder Instability1998 · 734 citations
  4. 4Minimal clinically important differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale pain scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair2020 · 156 citations
  5. 5Long-term Outcomes of a Contemporary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Technique in Patients With Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up2025 · 12 citations